Inhalt mit Veröffentlichungen bzgl GmmM/Frankenstein-Spritzen und Alternativ Vit D3

-1- Offene Brief der Verantwortiungsbewüßte Ärzte, Apotheker und Wissenschaftler

-2- Veröffentlichte Forschungsergebnisse bzgl Vitamine D3

-3- Prof. Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Vorsitzender der Arzneimittelausschuss des Ärztenkammers

-4- FDA der VSA; Warnungen bzgl Pfizer-Spritze

-5- Chlordioxid 30 mg täglich, Oxidator gegen (verharrenden) Mikroben

-6- Äußerungen mit Bedenken bzgl Impfungen

-1- Offene Brief der Verantwortiungsbewüßte Ärzte, Apotheker und Wissenschaftler An die

Bundesärztekammer Präsident Herrn Dr. Klaus Reinhardt Vizepräsidentinnen Frau Dr. Heidrun Gitter und Frau Dr. Ellen Lundershausen Herbert-Lewin-Platz 1 10623 Berlin

und an den

Vorstand der Bundesapothekerkammer Präsident Herrn Thomas Benkert Vizepräsidentin Frau Ursula Funke Heidestraße 7 10557 Berlin

Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 „Fragen Sie Ihren Arzt oder Apotheker“

Sehr geehrter Herr Präsident / sehr geehrte Frau Präsidentin,

Kassenärztliche Vereinigungen und Ärzte- und Apothekerkammern riefen in den vergangenen Wochen ihre Mitglieder auf, sich an den Impfaktionen gegen SARS-CoV-2 in staatlich eingerichteten Impfzentren zu beteiligen. Wir als namentlich unterzeichnende ÄrztInnen, ApothekerInnen und NaturwissenschaftlerInnen können diese Impfungen aus medizinisch-wissenschaftlichen, ethischen und berufsrechtlichen Gründen1 weder unterstützen noch befürworten. Wir fordern Sie auf, die Ärzte- und Apothekerschaft über die unten aufgeführten Sachverhalte unverzüglich zu informieren. Wir bitten Sie dringend, Ihre Unterstützung dieser Impfaktionen angesichts des derzeitigen Kenntnisstandes über unkalkulierbare Risiken2,3,4,5,6 speziell dieser Impfung einzustellen. Dies entspricht der Verantwortung unseres ärztlichen und pharmazeutischen Berufes und dem Gelöbnis1 des Berufstandes zum Schutze der PatientInnen.

Begründung

1. Impfstoffe haben wie andere Arzneimittel auch unerwünschte Wirkungen. Diese können im Einzelfall schwerwiegend bis tödlich sein. Dies hatte sich beispielsweise im Rahmen der Pandemrix-Impfung gegen H1N1-Viren im Jahr 2009 gezeigt. Hier war das Nutzen-Risiko- Verhältnis im Rückblick eindeutig negativ. Der immense Schaden, insbesondere das gehäufte Auftreten von Narkolepsie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen, war letztlich weitaus größer als der ex ante vermutete Nutzen13. Die Geschädigten leiden an diesen Impfschäden bis heute.

2. Um Schäden durch Arzneimittel und Impfstoffe so weit wie möglich zu verhindern, wurden als Lehre aus der Contergan-Katastrophe mit dem Arzneimittelgesetz 1978 in Deutschland gesetzliche Anforderungen für die Entwicklung, Herstellung und Prüfung von Arzneimitteln und Impfstoffen geschaffen und bis heute immer weiter verbessert. Diese Regularien sind mittlerweile weltweit weitgehend vereinheitlicht. Wie wichtig die frühzeitige Erfassung unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen für eine Nutzen-Risiko-Bewertung von Impfstoffen ist, hat sich nicht erst mit dem Pandemrix-Skandal gezeigt.

3. Die Entwicklung eines Impfstoffes ist komplex und aufwendig, sie erfordert umfangreiche Prüfungen nicht nur zur Wirksamkeit, sondern auch zur Unbedenklichkeit. Diese Prüfungen umfassen präklinische pharmakologische und toxikologische Studien, die unter normalen Umständen mehrere Jahre dauern können. Erst wenn diese Untersuchungen keine unverhältnismäßigen Risiken erkennen lassen, darf ein Impfstoff erstmalig Menschen verabreicht werden. Diese sogenannten präklinischen Untersuchungen, insbesondere Langzeitstudien fehlen wegen der kurzen Entwicklungszeit der SARS-CoV-2-Vakzine weitgehend. Auf die damit verbundenen Risiken der Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 hat u.a. der Immunologe und Toxikologe Hockertz hingewiesen3,8.

4. Auch im unabhängigen Informationsblatt „Der Arzneimittelbrief“ (Hrsg. ist u.a. der Vorsitzende der Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft) werden offene Fragen und Bedenken hinsichtlich Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der im Zulassungsverfahren befindlichen Impfstoffe gegen SARS-CoV-2 diskutiert.7 Die laufenden klinischen Phasen I und II wurden durch sog. „Teleskopierung“ stark verkürzt; dies unter Inkaufnahme unkalkulierbarer Risiken (z.B. unerwünschte Autoimmunreaktionen). Der Arzneimittelbrief konstatiert zudem7: „Auch wird ein sehr wichtiger Wirksamkeitsendpunkt der Impfstoffe, die „sterile Immunität“ in den laufenden Studien kaum berücksichtigt. Würde durch eine Impfung eine anhaltende sterile Immunität erreicht – die ideale Wirkung einer Impfung - könnten Infektionsketten unterbrochen werden. Die bisher publizierten Ergebnisse der laufenden Impfstudien lassen das aber kaum erwarten.“

5. Bei den derzeit in Europa im Zulassungsverfahren befindlichen Impfstoffen gegen SARS- CoV-2 handelt es sich teilweise um genetische Impfstoffe mit neuen Wirkmechanismen. Solche Impfstoffe wurden bisher zur Anwendung beim Menschen weltweit noch nicht zugelassen5,8. Die Entwicklung und Prüfung dieser Impfstoffe erfordert eine besonders sorgfältige Bewertung des Nutzen-Risiko-Profils. Die hierfür erforderlichen Daten sind in den verkürzten Zulassungsverfahren nicht zu gewinnen.

6. Daher muss im Hinblick auf die geplante Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 festgestellt werden, dass die Impfstoffe nicht lege artis entsprechend den regulatorischen Anforderungen entwickelt wurden. Die verkürzten Entwicklungszeiträume implizieren erhebliche Risiken. Die bisher geltenden Anforderungen zur Zulassung vorausgesetzt, wäre hier eine Entwicklungs- und Zulassungszeit von 5 bis 8 Jahren erforderlich8.

7. Aufgrund massiver Sicherheitsbedenken angesichts der bisherigen Studienlage9 forderten Wodarg und Yeadon die EMA in einer Petition auf, die laufenden klinischen Zulassungsstudien zu beenden. Die potentiellen Impfschäden können derzeit weder hinsichtlich ihrer Häufigkeit noch ihrer Schwere5,6 ausreichend eingeschätzt werden. Zu nennende Risiken sind beispielsweise: a. Das „Antibody Dependant Enhancement“ (ADE), eine bekannte unerwünschte Wirkung bei Impfstoffen, die für Dengue-, Ebola-, HI-, RS- und andere Coronaviren untersucht wurde. Hier kommt es zu einer überschießenden Immunreaktion bei der Infektion mit dem jeweiligen Virus nach der Impfung und damit zu einer in der Regel schwerwiegenden Erkrankung bis hin zu Todesfolgen. Dies waren Gründe, warum bisherige Versuche, Impfstoffe gegen Coronaviren zu entwickeln, bereits basierend auf den in-vitro- Daten bzw. tierexperimentellen Daten abgebrochen werden mussten7. b. Allergenität mit schweren und schwersten allergischen Reaktionen gegen Impfstoffe, denen Polyethylenglycol oder Nanopartikel zugesetzt werden5. c. Antikörperentwicklung gegen Spike- Proteine und damit auch gegen Syncytin-1 mit einer potentiell sich hieraus ergebenden weiblichen Infertilität9 und möglichem Einfluss auf die Ausbildung neuropsychiatrischer Erkrankungen wie MS und Schizophrenie9,10.

8. Bereits die Verabreichung von Impfstoffen, für die ein positives Nutzen-Risiko-Verhältnis nicht mit hinreichender Sicherheit nachgewiesen werden kann, erscheint uns ethisch nicht vertretbar. Wenn aber darüber hinaus, wie hier vorliegend, potentielle Risiken nicht adäquat untersucht wurden und es ernstzunehmende Hinweise auf erhebliche gesundheitliche Risiken speziell dieser Impfung gibt, dann ist die Verabreichung einer solchen Impfung aus unserer Sicht unverantwortlich und für uns mit dem ärztlichen Berufsethos nicht vereinbar1.

Fazit Aus den genannten Gründen (unvollständige Datenlage, nicht kalkulierbare medizinische Risiken) können wir die Einführung der neuen Impfstoffe weder befürworten noch unterstützen.

Auch die erfolgte Zulassung der neuen Impfstoffe durch die EMA entbindet uns als ÄrztInnen und ApothekerInnen nicht von der medizinisch- wissenschaftlichen11 und juristischen Verantwortung12 gegenüber jedem einzelnen Menschen. Dies schließt eine gewissenhafte individualisierte Aufklärung, Beratung und Applikation ein.

Die Einbeziehung und Anhörung kritischer Experten und Wissenschaftler ist zwingend und zeitnah geboten und sollte jetzt auch von Ärzte- und Apothekerorganisationen gefordert werden. Politik und Pharmaindustrie werden mit dem Argument, nach bestem Wissen gehandelt zu haben, ihre Verantwortung letztlich an die Ärzte und auch Apotheker als beratende und ausführende Instanz weitergeben. Die beteiligten ÄrztInnen und ApothekerInnen stehen am Ende der Verantwortungskette. Es ist die Pflicht aller ÄrztInnen und ApothekerInnen, ihr Wissen um medizinische Risiken insbesondere dieser Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 zum Wohl der ihnen anvertrauten PatientInnen einzusetzen und ein Handeln mit potentiell schädlichen Folgen zu unterlassen. In drängender Sorge bitten wir unsere Standesvertretungen, die oben aufgeführten Aspekte in die Überlegungen zur Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 einzubeziehen, über Risiken angemessen

aufzuklären und die bisherige offene oder indirekte Befürwortung der Impfung zu beenden.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen als Korrespondenzadressen

Dr. med. Thomas Hampe (Chirurg /Unfallchirurg a.D.), Ginsterweg 19, 59821 Arnsberg Priv.-Doz. Dipl.-Psych. Dr. med. Christian Wolff (FA für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin), Zur Höhe 67a, 58091 Hagen Radimé Farhumand (Ärztin für Anästhesie), Roggenkampsweg 6, 45883 Gelsenkirchen Astrid Kipp (Apothekerin), Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 11, 33378 Rheda-Wiedenbrück Dr. rer. nat. Notker Böhm (Apotheker), Am Mühlenrain 4, 04435 Schkeuditz Rolf-Herbert Müller (Arzt für Allgemeinmedizin und Chirotherapie), Azorenstr. 10e, 33729 Bielefeld Dr. med. Ulrich Zacharias (FA für Gynäkologie), Altenmeller Ring 12, 49324 Melle Dr. med. Thomas Quak (Arzt), Hauptstr. 18, 82256 Fürstenfeldbruck Dr. med. Matthias Keilich (Arzt), Bismarckstr. 72/73, 12157 Berlin-Steglitz Dr. rer. nat. Angela Klein (Apothekerin), Järkendorfer Str. 8, 97332 Volkach Heike Friedländer (Apothekerin), Poststr. 4, 18225 Kühlungsborn Bettina Weisheit (Apothekerin), Lahnstr. 10, 26382 Wilhelmshaven Dr. med. Andreas Becking (FA für Innere Medizin und Psychotherapie), Eisenbahnstr. 64, 79098 Freiburg Dr. med. Michaela Hösl (FÄ für Innere Medizin und Nephrologie), Zehlendorfer Damm 75, 14532 Kleinmachnow Helmut Keil (Arzt), Weikersbergstr. 26, 89551 Königsbronn

Anlage 1

Wir nachfolgend Unterzeichnende sind ÄrztInnen, ApothekerInnen, PsychotherapeutInnen und WissenschaftlerInnen. Mit diesem Schreiben bringen wir unsere tiefe Besorgnis über den aktuellen Stand der geplanten Impfung gegen SARS-CoV-2 zum Ausdruck. Wir befürworten individuelle Impfentscheidungen. Wir kennen bei COVID-19 potenziell schwere und in Einzelfällen auch tödliche Verläufe, wie bei anderen viralen Erkrankungen auch. Wir gehören keiner parteipolitischen Gruppierung an und empfinden uns mit unserem Gewissen unserer beruflichen Verantwortung und dem Wohl der uns anvertrauten PatientInnen verpflichtet.

Literatur

Alle Links überprüft am 23. Dezember 2020

1. BÄK, Muster-Berufsordnung für die in Deutschland tätigen Ärzte, DÄB, 1.Febr. 2019; A 1-9; hier: Präambel und § 2 Abs.2 bis 4 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.mbo_daet2018b und

https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/pdf- Ordner/MBO/MBO-AE.pdf

2. Phillips, N., et al. A leading coronavirus vaccine trial is on hold: scientists react. Nature 2020 Sept. 9 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-02594-w und https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32908295/

3. Hockertz, S., 5. Dez. 2020 Diese Impfung ist ein Experiment an Menschen https://reitschuster.de/post/die-impfung-ist-ein-experiment-an-menschen/

4. Haseltine, W.A. The Risks of Rushing a COVID-19 Vaccine Scientific American 2020 June 22 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-risks-of-rushing-a-covid-19-vaccine/

5. Jiang, S.: Don’t rush to deploy COVID-19 vaccines and drugs without sufficient guarantees Nature 2020 March 16 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00751-9

6. Folegatti, P., et al.: Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nVoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report Lancet 2020 Aug15; 396(10249):467-478 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32702298/

7. Zur Entwicklung genetischer Impfstoffe gegen SARS-CoV-2 - technologische Ansätze sowie klinische Risiken als Folge verkürzter Prüfphasen 2020, 54, 85 Arzneimittelbrief Nov. 2020, aktualisiert Dez. 2020

8. Hockertz, S., Impfstoffe_ Von der Entwicklung bis zur Zulassung – Kritische Betrachtung eines Immuntoxikologen, Umwelt - Medizin – Gesellschaft, 33, 4/2020

9. Petition Wodarg, W., Yeadon, M., Petition/ Motion to EMA: 2020, Dec.1,

https://www.wodarg.com/app/download/9033912514/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_T rial_FINAL_01DEC2020_signed_with_Exhibits_geschwa%CC%88rzt.pdf?t=1607445169

10. Wang X, Huang J, Zhu F. Human Endogenous Retroviral Envelope Protein Syncytin-1 and Inflammatory Abnormalities in Neuropsychological Diseases. Front Psychiatry 2018 Sep 7; 9:422 doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00422 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00422/full

11. Vorstand der Bundesärztekammer, 18.10.2019, auf Empfehlung des Wissenschaftlichen Beirates: Wissenschaftlichkeit als konstitutionelles Element des Arztberufs, Deutsches Ärzteblatt, Jg 117, Heft 4, 24. Januar 2020 DOI: 10.3238/baek_wb_sn_wiss2020

https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/pdf- Ordner/WB/Stellungnahme_Wissenschaftlichkeit.pdf

12. Parzeller, M. et al., Aufklärung und Einwilligung bei ärztlichen Eingriffen, Deutsches Ärzteblatt Jg.104, Heft 9, 2. März 2007 https://cdn.aerzteblatt.de/pdf/104/9/a576.pdf?ts=26.08.2009+07%3A35%3A17

13. Grippeimpfung: wie Pandemrix eine Narkolepsie auslöste, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2. Juli 2015: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/63356/Grippeimpfung-Wie-Pandemrix-eine- Narkolepsie-ausloest

-2- Veröffentlichte Forschungsergebnisse bzgl Vitamine D3

Vitamina D nella prevenzione e nel trattamento del COVID-19: nuove evidenze

7 Dicembre 2020 | Filed under: In evidenza | Posted by: Redazione

Con l’intento di fornire un utile contributo ed un supporto scientifico alle Istituzioni per contrastare la pandemia da COVID-19, l’Accademia di Medicina di Torino ha istituito un gruppo di lavoro, coordinato dal suo Presidente, Prof Giancarlo Isaia,  Professore di Geriatria e da Antonio D’Avolio, Professore di Farmacologia all’Università di Torino, e composto da 61 Medici di molte città italiane; è stato elaborato un documento (a margine), inviato alle autorità sanitarie nazionali e regionali, che riporta sinteticamente le più recenti e convincenti evidenze scientifiche sugli effetti positivi della vitamina D, sia nella prevenzione che nelle complicanze del coronavirus, e che può essere condiviso inviando una mail all’Accademia di Medicina di Torino (accademia.medicina@unito.it).  

Vitamina D nella prevenzione e nel trattamento del COVID-19: nuove evidenze

La pandemia da Coronavirus si è manifestata e diffusa con caratteristiche peculiari e, nonostante sia presente da circa un anno, la ricerca scientifica, orientata prevalentemente verso la sintesi di anticorpi specifici diretti sull’agente etiologico e la produzione di un vaccino, non ha fornito sufficienti conoscenze: poco si sa delle caratteristiche fisiopatologiche della malattia, dei meccanismi che ne favoriscono l’aggressione alla specie umana, dei target verso cui indirizzare un trattamento farmacologico, e, infine, neppure delle caratteristiche immunologiche del virus. Tutto ciò rende molto problematiche le strategie difensive, ad oggi di fatto limitate alle indiscutibili e fondamentali misure di distanziamento fisico e di igiene individuale.

Sulla base di queste premesse, ci permettiamo di richiamare l’attenzione delle Istituzioni, del mondo scientifico e dell’opinione pubblica su un aspetto, già sollevato nei mesi scorsi (Isaia G & Medico E, https//doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01650-9) che si è via via accreditato con numerose evidenze scientifiche: ci riferiamo alla carenza di vitamina D, della quale sono noti da tempo gli effetti sulla risposta immunitaria, sia innata che adattiva (Charoenngam N & Holick M, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072097) e che si sviluppa nei pazienti affetti da COVID-19 in conseguenza di differenti meccanismi fisiopatologici (Aygun H et al., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-020-01911-4), ma forse anche a seguito di una ridotta disponibilità di 7-deidrocolesterolo e di conseguenza del suo metabolita colecalciferolo, per la  marcata riduzione della colesterolemia osservata nei pazienti con forme moderate o severe di COVID-19 (Marcello A. et al., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101682).  

Ad oggi è possibile reperire su PubMed circa 300 lavori, editi nel 2020, con oggetto il legame tra COVID-19 e vitamina D, condotti sia retrospettivamente (Meltzer D et al., https://doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19722), che con metanalisi (Pereira M et al., https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1841090), che hanno confermato la presenza di ipovitaminosi D nella maggioranza dei pazienti affetti da COVID-19, soprattutto se in forma severa (Kohlmeier M et al., https://doi:10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000096) e di una più elevata mortalità (OR 3,87) ad essa associata (De Smet D et al., https://doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa252): tutti questi dati forniscono a nostro giudizio interessanti elementi di riflessione e di ripensamento su un intervento potenzialmente utile a tutta la popolazione anziana, che in Italia è in larga misura carente di vitamina D (Isaia G et al., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1390-7). E’ stata infatti largamente evidenziata, con un’unica eccezione riportata in un lavoro, peraltro non ancora pubblicato e condotto su pazienti in uno stadio molto avanzato della malattia (Murai IH et al., https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.20232397), l’utilità della somministrazione di Vitamina D (in prevalenza colecalciferolo) a pazienti COVID-19. A scopo propositivo, abbiamo selezionato alcuni dati, ottenuti con adeguata sperimentazione clinica, che a nostro parere, nonostante alcuni limiti metodologici, sono degni di attenzione da parte delle autorità sanitarie, al fine di considerare l’utilizzo della Vitamina D sia per la prevenzione che per il trattamento dei pazienti COVID-19.

1. In uno studio osservazionale di 6 settimane su 154 pazienti, la prevalenza di soggetti ipovitaminosici D (<20 ng/mL) è risultata del 31,86% negli asintomatici e del 96,82% in quelli che sono stati poi ricoverati in terapia intensiva (Jain A et al., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77093-z)

2. In uno studio randomizzato su 76 pazienti oligosintomatici, la percentuale di soggetti per i quali è stato necessario, successivamente, il ricovero in terapia intensiva, è stata del 2% (1/50) se trattati con dosi elevate di calcifediolo e del 50% (13/26) nei pazienti non trattati (Castillo ME et al., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105751).

3. Uno studio retrospettivo su oltre 190.000 pazienti ha evidenziato la presenza di una significativa correlazione fra la bassa percentuale dei soggetti positivi alla malattia e più elevati livelli circolanti di 25OHD (Kaufman HW et al., https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239252)

4. In 77 soggetti anziani ospedalizzati per COVID-19, la probabilità di sopravvivenza alla malattia, stimata con la curva di Kaplan–Meier, è risultata significativamente correlata con la somministrazione di colecalciferolo, assunto nell’anno precedente alla dose di 50.000 UI al mese, oppure di 80.000-100.000 UI per 2-3 mesi, oppure ancora di 80.000 UI al momento della diagnosi. (Annweiler G. et al., GERIA-COVID Study https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113377)

5. Nei pazienti PCR-positivi per SARS-CoV-2, i livelli di vitamina D sono risultati significativamente minori (p=0.004) rispetto a quelli dei pazienti PCR-negativi  (dato poi confermato da altri lavori in termini di maggiore velocità di clearance virale e guarigione per coloro che hanno livelli ematici più elevati di vitamina D) (D’Avolio et al., https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051359).

6. In una sperimentazione clinica su 40 pazienti asintomatici o paucisintomatici è stata osservata la negativizzazione della malattia nel 62,5% (10/16) dei pazienti trattati con alte dosi di colecalciferolo (60.000 UI/die per 7 giorni), contro il 20,8% (5/24) dei pazienti del gruppo di controllo. Nei pazienti trattati è stata inoltre riscontrata una riduzione significativa dei livelli plasmatici di fibrinogeno (Rastogi A. et al., SHADE Study  http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139065)

Sulla base dei risultati di questi e di altri studi, formuliamo le seguenti considerazioni:

1. Anche se sono necessari ulteriori studi controllati, la vitamina D sembra più efficace contro il COVID-19 (sia per la velocità di negativizzazione, sia per l’evoluzione benigna della malattia in caso di infezione) se somministrata con obiettivi di prevenzione (Balla M et al., https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1811074), soprattutto nei soggetti anziani, fragili e istituzionalizzati.

2. Il target plasmatico minimo ottimale del 25(OH)D da raggiungere in ambito PREVENTIVO sarebbe di 40 ng/mL (Maghbooli Z. et al., https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239799), per ottenere il quale occorre somministrare elevate dosi di colecalciferolo, anche in relazione ai livelli basali del paziente, e fino a 4000 UI/die (Arboleda JF & Urcuqui-Inchima S, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01523)

3. In ambito TERAPEUTICO, gli studi randomizzati indicano l’utilità di un’unica somministrazione in bolo di 80.000 UI di colecalciferolo (N° 4, Annweiler G et al.),  oppure di calcifediolo (0,532 mg il 1° giorno, 0,266 mg il 3°, il 7° giorno e poi una volta alla settimana) (N° 2, Castillo ME et al.), oppure ancora di 60000 IU di colecalciferolo per 7 giorni, con l’obiettivo di raggiungere 50 ng/mL di 25 (OH)D (N° 6, Rastogi A et al.).

Nonostante questi ed altri dati, l’impiego della Vitamina D nella prevenzione e nella terapia del COVID-19 non è stato preso in considerazione, con la giustificazione dell’assenza di un’evidenza scientifica sufficiente, che invece, a differenza di altre vitamine o integratori, nei lavori più recenti sta a poco a poco emergendo.

In Gran Bretagna invece, e prima ancora in Scozia, con disposizione governativa, (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/14/covid-uk-government-requests-guidance-on-vitamin-d-use) è stata recentemente disposta la supplementazione di vitamina D a 2,7 milioni di soggetti a rischio di COVID-19 (gli anziani, la popolazione di colore e i residenti nelle RSA) con un’operazione che alla Camera dei Comuni è stata definita “low-cost, zero-risk, potentially highly effective action”: ne è seguito un vivace dibattito scientifico, con qualche riserva espressa dal NICE (https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/es28/resources/covid19-rapid-evidence-summary-vitamin-d-for-covid19-pdf-1158182526661), ma con il sostegno della Royal Society of London (https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201912https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201912) che la definisce  “…seems nothing to lose and potentially much to gain”

In conclusione, anche se l’utilità della Vitamina D nella prevenzione e nel trattamento del COVID-19 non è ancora del tutto ben definita, riteniamo che i dati che abbiamo sinteticamente riportato, suggeriscano un serio approfondimento in materia:

1. con l’attivazione di una consensus conference e/o di uno studio clinico randomizzato e controllato, promosso e supportato dallo Stato, sull’efficacia terapeutica della Vitamina D, a pazienti sintomatici o oligosintomatici,secondo uno dei seguenti schemi:

2. Colecalciferolo per via orale 60.000 UI/die per 7 giorni consecutivi

3. Colecalciferolo in monosomministrazione orale 80.000 (nei pazienti anziani)

4. Calcifediolo 0.532 mg (106 gocce) nel giorno 1 e 0,266 mg (53 gocce) nei giorni 3 e       

5. e poi in monosomministrazione settimanale.

6. Con la somministrazione preventiva di Colecalciferolo orale (fino a 4000 UI/die) a soggetti a rischio di contagio (anziani, fragili, obesi, operatori sanitari, congiunti di pazienti infetti, soggetti in comunità chiuse); segnaliamo che in questo ambito l’utilizzo della vitamina D che, anche ad alte dosi, non presenta sostanziali effetti collaterali (Murai IH et al., https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.20232397), è comunque utile per correggere una situazione di specifica carenza generale della popolazione, soprattutto nel periodo invernale, indipendentemente dalla infezione da SARS-CoV-2.

A disposizione per ulteriori ragguagli, auspichiamo che questa nostra proposta, supportata da suggestive evidenze scientifiche, venga presa in seria considerazione e di conseguenza vengano assunti i provvedimenti ritenuti più opportuni,

1. Giancarlo Isaia Professore di Geriatria, Università di Torino e Presidente dell’Accademia di Medicina di Torino

2. Antonio D’Avolio Professore di Farmacologia, Università di Torino

3. Donato Agnusdei Endocrinologo, Siena

4. Paolo Arese Professore Emerito di Biochimica, Università di Torino

5. Marco Astegiano Responsabile ambulatori Gastroenterologia, Città della salute e della scienza di Torino

6. Mario Barbagallo  Professore Ordinario di Geriatria, Università di Palermo

7. Alessandro Bargoni Professore di Storia della Medicina, Università di Torino

8. Ettore Bologna Direttore Medico-scientifico della Fondazione Piera, Pietro e Giovanni Ferrero, Alba (CN)

9. Amalia Bosia  Professoressa Emerita di Biochimica, Università di Torino

10. Teresa Cammarota  Primario Emerito di Radiologia AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Vice Presidente dell’Accademia di Medicina di Torino

11. Mario Campogrande Primario Emerito di Ostetrica e Ginecologia, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

12. Rossana Cavallo Professoressa di Microbiologia, Università di Torino

13. Paolo Cavallo Perin Professore di Medicina Interna, Università di Torino

14. Carlo Ceruti Professore di Urologia, Università di Torino

15. Alessandro Comandone Primario di Oncologia, ASL Città di Torino

16. Fausto Crapanzano Responsabile UOC di Riabilitazione, ASP di Agrigento

17. Flora D’Ambrosio Fisiatra, INRCA-IRCCS, Ancona  

18. Giuseppe De Renzi Responsabile Microbiologia Laboratorio Analisi, AOU San Luigi  Orbassano (TO).

19. Umberto Dianzani Professore di Immunologia, Università del Piemonte Orientale

20. Francesco Di Carlo Professore Emerito di Farmacologia, Università di Torino,

21. Ombretta Di Munno Professoressa di Reumatologia, Università di Pisa

22. Marco Di Stefano Dirigente Medico di I livello di Geriatria, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

23. Ligia Dominguez  Professoressa di Geriatria, Università di Palermo

24. Pier Paolo Donadio già Direttore del Dip. di Anestesia, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

25. Roberto Fantozzi Professore di Farmacologia, Università di Torino

26. Etta Finocchiaro Dirigente Medico Dietetica e Nutrizione Clinica, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

27. Guido Forni  Immunologo, Socio dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei

28. Cristiano Maria Francucci Endocrinologo, INRCA-IRCCS Ancona

29. Gianluca Isaia  Dirigente Medico di I livello di Geriatria, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

30. Maurizio Maggiorotti Segretario Generale della Federazione Italiana Ossigeno-Ozono

31. Fabio Malavasi Professore Emerito di Genetica Medica, Università di Torino

32. Patrizia Mecocci Professoressa di Gerontologia e Geriatria, Università d Perugia

33. Enzo Medico Professore di Istologia, Università di Torino,

34. Sivia Migliaccio Professoressa di Scienze Tecniche Applicate, Università Foro Italico di Roma

35. Marco Alessandro Minetto Professore di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, Università di Torino

36. Giovanni Minisola Reumatologo, Presidente emerito SIR e Direttore Scientifico Fondazione “San Camillo-Forlanini” – Roma

37. Mario Nano Professore di Chirurgia Generale, Università di Torino

38. Fabio Orlandi  Professore di Endocrinologia, Università di Torino

39. Luca Pietrogrande Professore di Ortopedia, Università di Milano

40. Giuseppe Poli Professore di Patologia Generale, Università di Torino

41. Patrizia Presbitero Primario d Cardiologia interventistica, Istituto clinico Humanitas di Rozzano (MI)

42. Pietro Quaglino, Professore di Dermatologia, Università di Torino

43. Giovanni Renato Riccardi Fisiatra, INRCA-IRCCS Ancona  

44. Giovanni Ricevuti Professore di Geriatria, Università di Pavia

45. Dario Roccatello Professore di  Nefrologia, Università di Torino

46. Floriano Rosina Gastroenterologo, Torino

47. Carmelinda Ruggiero Professoressa di Geriatria, Università di Perugia

48. Giuseppe Saglio Professore di Ematologia, Università di Torino

49. Sergio Salomone Ortopedico, Direttore Sanitario Centro Medico polispecialistico, Palermo

50. Anna Sapino Professoressa di Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Università di Torino

51. Francesco Scarnati Ortopedico, Centro Medilab, Taverna di Montalto (CS)

52. Francesco Scaroina Primario Emerito di Medicina Generale, AOU Città di Torino

53. Giuseppe Segoloni Professore di Nefrologia, Università di Torino

54. Luigi Massimino Sena Professore di Patologia Generale, Università di Torino

55. Umberto Senin  Professore Emerito di Gerontologia e Geriatria, Università di Perugia

56. Endrit Shahini Gastroenterologo-endoscopista, IRCCS Cancer Institute di Candiolo (TO)

57. Alberto Silvestri Dirigente medico di I livello di Medicina Interna, ASO Santa Croce e Carle di Cuneo

58. Piero Stratta Professore di Nefrologia, Università del Piemonte Orientale

59. Gabriella Tanturri Otorinolaringoiatra, già Direttrice SS day Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

60. Alessandro Vercelli Professore di Anatomia Umana, Università di Torino

61. Elsa Viora Direttrice SS Ecografia e diagnosi prenatale, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Nota: Le sottoscrizioni sono a titolo personale, senza coinvolgimento delle rispettive Istituzioni di riferimento

Condividi sui social

-3- Prof. Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Vorsitzender der Arzneimittelausschuss des Ärztenkammers

In an interview with Die Welt, December 5, 2020, the chairman of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association, Prof. Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, criticizes the study situation for the BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines – and would therefore not currently be vaccinated against Covid-19.

When asked about the fact that the well known virologist Prof. Alexander Kekulé did not want to be vaccinated immediately, Prof. Ludwig replies:

“Mr. Kekulé is a member of our commission. I do not always agree with everything he says, but in this case I will do the same. I already belong to the risk group in terms of my age. But I am waiting for the results of the clinical trials to be published.

Specifically, I would like to see what age groups were tested, what the side effects were in each population. I would also like to know how long the immunity lasts. It is not clear whether the vaccination needs to be refreshed, as is the case with tetanus, diphtheria or whooping cough”.

The physician also takes a critical view of the statement by Federal Research Minister Anja Karliczek (CDU) that the vaccine is safe and no one needs to worry. Because with the current state of knowledge such a sentence is “ill-considered”.

„The Minister could say that indications of severe, acute side effects have not yet been found. But she said that it was not known to what extent particularly endangered persons had been tested at all.“

“Even the long-term side effects can naturally not yet be assessed today. All we have are press releases from the manufacturers. I experience this for the first time in the many, many years in which I evaluate clinical studies on drugs,” Professor Ludwig tells Die Welt.

He goes on and harply criticises the alleged effectiveness of the vaccines because what was presented to the world public “reminded him of an auction”.

„BioNTech had promised 90 percent efficacy in order to be outbid by Moderna with 94 percent, which BioNTech countered with 95 percent.“

However, he would have “preferred to know who was tested at all, which endpoints were investigated and what the percentage of elderly people with concomitant diseases was. It was unclear whether there were high-risk patients among the test persons. Exact information on this would be missing.

As one of the further weak points the physician regards the high number of test persons. For the proof of efficacy, BioNTech refers to 170 infected persons. Of these, 162 were in the comparison group, eight in the vaccine group. With Moderna, on the other hand, the figure is 90 versus five.

Prof. Ludwig it is therefore certain:

“These are very few events overall. If you want to bring a new drug onto the market with such data, you have a problem.

„And what annoys me even more: we do not know who these 170 or 95 infected people are. Younger people who are positive but without symptoms, or older patients with potentially serious illnesses?

We currently do not know how the vaccine will work in high-risk patients, those who need to be protected first and foremost”.

Prof. Ludwig also spoke on Austrian TV, ORF, about a possible compulsory vaccination which he gave a clear rebuff.

-4- FDA der VSA; Warnungen bzgl Pfizer-Spritze

Pfizer vaccines adverse effects.

From FDA

Among reported unsolicited adverse events, lymphadenopathy occurred much more frequently in the vaccine group than the placebo group and is plausibly related to vaccination.  

from drugs,com

Lymphadenopathy is usually caused by a bacterial, viral, or fungal infection. Other causes include autoimmune diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis or lupus), cancer, and sarcoidosis.

mRNA Vaccine is itself genetically engineered viral RNA bioagent and generate immune response to itself potentially causing Lymphadenopathy similar to common immune response to adenovirus viral vector vaccines.

mRNA vaccine inherently by itself, being itself perceived by immune system as another pathogen, is potentially may trigger dangerous enhanced immune response even cytokine shock.

Such situation is common among other therapeutic drugs aimed at specific diseases being “neutralized “ by immune system and hence demands clinical drug based suppression of immune system of patients. This is why there are two vaccinations required, fist of them is solely for purpose of suppression of immune system to allow second vaccination to go largely unchallenged.

The danger of mRNA vaccines is among others potentially introducing shock autoimmune immune response not to viral antigen (spike protein) it produces, as it is assumed by the vaccine model, but to mRNA vaccine or viral vector vaccines themselves.

Lymphadenopathy would be one likely type of response to such vaccines. Severe Allergic reaction suddenly discovered among those vaccinated would be other manifestation of the same response to foreign bioagents attacked by human immune system.

we are being inoculated with bioagents having nothing to do with SARS-Cov2 virus or COVID against which bioagents our organism tries to defend itself, in other words such vaccines introduce new disease to our body called euphemistically and wrongly adverse effects.

-5- Chlordioxid 30 mg täglich, Oxidator gegen (verharrenden) Mikroben

CHLORDIOXID, CORONAVIRUS, GESELLSCHAFT, GESUNDHEITSWESEN, ZAHNMEDIZIN

DAS UNIVERSELLE GEGENMITTEL

30. JANUAR 2021 CHRISTOPH BECKER 38 KOMMENTARE

Eigentlich wollte ich einen Artikel mit dem Titel “MaiLabs Quatsch” schreiben, in dem ich systematisch die Quellen unter MaiLabs Youtubevideo “MMS ist Gift! Wirklich” demontiere. Inzwischen erscheint mir  das wegen eines kurzen, kleinen Videos mit einem mit Chlordioxid von Covid-19 geheilten mexikanischen Millionär und zwei in der Behandlung von Coronapatienten sehr erfahrenen Ärzten nicht mehr nötig.

Inhaltsverzeichnis [Ausblenden]

• 1 Der 1-Million Dollar Wettbewerb

• 2 Nicht nur bei Infektionskrankheiten

• 3 Noch ein Interview mit Dr. Patricia Callisperis:

• 4 Das universelle Antidote – eine Doku über Chlordioxid

o 4.1 Nachträge der Links/Downloadmöglichkeiten zur Doku

• 5 Erschütterndes Beispiel einer Friseurin

• 6 Die Fitness der Alten verbessern

• 7 Das Problem der antibiotikaresistenten Keime

• 8 Ein Beispiel für den Weg in die Zukunft

• 9 Nachträge

o 9.1 Ist Chlordioxid wirklich ein Bleichmittel?

o 9.2 Videos mit deutschen Untertiteln

o 9.3 Videos in deutscher Sprache

Der 1-Million Dollar Wettbewerb

Ein reicher mexikanischer Geschäftsmann war selbst an Covid-19 erkrankt, ist davon mit Hilfe von Chlordioxidlösung geheilt worden und hat mit Blick auf die von der FDA, den “Qualitätsmedien”, MaiLab und anderen verbreiteten Falschinformationen und Lügen eine Million Dollar Belohnung für denjenigen ausgesetzt, der als erstes beweisen kann, dass Chlordioxid in der von Andreas Kalcker zur Behandlung von Covid-19 empfohlenen Konzentration und Dosierung toxisch ist. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass dieser Beweis gelingt ist natürlich null, wie nicht nur viele wissenschaftliche Studien, sondern auch die Aussagen der beiden in dem Filmchen zu Wort kommenden Ärzte zeigen. Der erste der beiden Ärzte, Dr. Manuel Aparicio, hat seit Mai 2020 mehr als  3000 an Covid-19 erkrankte Patienten mit Chlordioxid behandelt. Die Erfolgsrate habe bei 99,6 % gelegen. In seinem Verantwortungsbereich haben außerdem über 50.000 Personen Chlordioxid zu Prävention von Covid-19 eingenommen, ohne dass es bei irgendwem zu der Vergiftung oder Verätzung gekommen ist, vor der die FDA, MaiLab und die “Qualitätsmedien” die Bevölkerung immer wieder gewarnt haben.

Der zweite zu Wort kommende Arzt, Dr. Pedro Chavez, ein Oberst der mexikanischen Streitkräfte, trinkt seit Beginn der Pandemie vor 9 Monaten täglich Chlordioxidlösung (CDL). Obwohl er auch an Covid-19 erkrankte Patienten hat, die ihm ins Gesicht husten, hat er in diesen 9 Monaten weder Covid-19 noch eine Grippe gehabt. Es sei sehr einfach und sehr preiswert Chlordioxidlösung anzuwenden und es rette Leben. Er habe in den letzten 9 Monaten ca. 3000 an Covid-19 erkrankte Patienten mit Chlordioxidlösung behandelt. Die Erfolgsrate habe bei 97 % gelegen. Dabei ist zu bedenken, dass Oberst Dr. Chavez Arzt an einem Militärhospital ist und dort wohl nicht die ganz leichten Fälle, sondern vor allem schwere und sehr schwere Fälle behandelt.

Wealthy Millionaire Makes $1,000,000 dollar challenge to the FDA

Auf demselben Videokanal (www.brighteon.com/channels/curiousoutlier ) finden sich derzeit  (30.1.2021) noch einige andere sehr interessante Videos, die den therapeutischen Wert von Chlordioxidlösung zeigen.

Nicht nur bei Infektionskrankheiten

Das folgende 2 Minuten 41 Sekunden dauernde Video zeigt

1. Eine hässliche, entstellende Hautkrankheit im Gesicht, vor Beginn der Behandlung und nach 20 und 45 Behandlungstagen. Nach 45 Tagen ist von der Erkrankung nichts mehr zu sehen.

2. Ein großes Geschwür am Auge eine Katze.  Vor der Behandlung. Nach mehreren Behandlungstagen. Nach 14 Behandlungstagen ist der Tumor kaum noch sichtbar.

3. Bis dahin nicht heilbare Läsionen der Lippen und der Mundschleimhaut. Vor der Behandlung. Drei Wochen nach Beginn der Behandlung ist nichts mehr zu sehen. Die Patientin hatte keinen Rückfall. D.h., der Heilerfolg war dauerhaft. Bei der Patientin könnte es sich um Frau Dr. Patricia Callisperis handeln, wie die Kombination aus den Bildern und dem Interview mit ihr weiter unten zeigt. Sie hatte sich selbst mit Chlordioxidlösung behandelt. In einem anderen Interview hat sie etwas ausführlicher erzählt, dass sie zunächst verschiedene Fachärzte in verschiedenen Ländern, einschließlich der USA, konsultiert habe und dass ihr niemand habe helfen können. Sie habe dann irgendwann im Internet einen Vortrag von Andreas Kalcker gehört. Erst habe sie gedacht das könne nicht sein, und es handele sich um Quacksalberei. Aber dann habe sie sich sich weiter informiert und das Protokol C nach Andreas Kalcker ausprobiert. Protokoll C bedeutet 30 mg ClO2 in einem Liter Wasser pro Tag in 10 Portionen, also 10 mal ca. 100 ml CDL mit 30 ppm.  Das habe sehr schnell zu einer Verbesserung der Symptome geführt und nach 3 Wochen sei sie wieder gesund gewesen. So sei sie zur Anwendung von Chlordioxid in der Medizin gekommen.

4. Ein Kind mit Epilepsie und Entwicklungsstörung. Vor Beginn und nach Ende der Behandlung. Nach der Behandlung wirkt das Kind normal.

5. Schrecklich aussehende, große, infizierte Brandwunden an beiden Füssen. Die Anwendung von Antibiotika hatte keine Verbesserung gebracht. Nach einem und dann nach zwei Monaten Behandlung mit Chlordioxidlösung waren die Heilerfolge jeweils sehr groß. Nach 2 Monaten sind die Wunden fast vollständig verheilt. Man kann im Wesentlichen nur noch die Narben sehen, wie man sie auch sonst bei Personen sieht, die irgendwann einmal eine schwere Verbrennung erlitten haben. Ich möchte hier dazu auch auf die Geschichte mit der schweren, bis dahin nicht heilbaren, offenen  Knochenwunde bei einer zuvor mit Biphosphonaten behandelten Patientin hinweisen, die ich in www.freizahn.de/2020/02/mehrzweckwaffe-gegen-viren-und-bakterien/#wundheilung mit Quelle erwähnt hatte.

Five Amazing Recoveries With THE UNIVERSAL ANTIDOTE

Noch ein Interview mit  Dr. Patricia Callisperis:

Ein erstes Interview mit Dr. Patricia Callisisperis, vom 16. Oktober 2020, habe ich in BYE-BYE COVID übersetzt. Dort findet man auch die Übersetzung, bzw. eine deutsche Mitschrift von Interviews mit den beiden Ärzten aus dem obigen Video, nämlich mit Dr. Manuel Aparicio  und mit Oberst Dr. Pedro Chavez.

Das folgende Interview mit Dr. Patricia Callisisperis will ich jetzt nicht auch noch übersetzen. Ärzte und die meisten anderen, die sich dafür interessieren dürften genug Englisch verstehen, um dem Interview folgen zu können.

Interview with Dr. Patricia Callisperis about The Universal Antidote

Das universelle Antidote – eine Doku über Chlordioxid

Nachtrag/Änderung 6.2.2021. Die englische Doku ist schon am 1.2.2021  erscheinen. Weiter unten sind alle mir bekannten Links dazu angegeben.  Von dem unten eingebundene Trailer zum englischsprachigen Original gibt es nun eine deutsch synchronisierte Version. Die mir bekannten Links dazu sind derzeit: https://t.me/MissionGesundheit/1016 und https://t.me/DirkSchrader/191

Trailer-The Universal Antidote (February 1, 2021 Release)

Es ist bezeichnend, dass diese Doku natürlich nicht von unseren, von der Bevölkerung bezahlten, öffentlich rechtlichen Sendeanstalten oder gar im Auftrag der Bundesregierung oder der EU-Kommission erstellt wurde, und dass auch die angeblichen “Qualtätsmedien” stattdessen systematisch versucht haben, dieses “Universelle Antidote” schlecht zu machen.

Es ist zu hoffen, dass die Doku schon bald deutsch synchronisiert wird, oder dass es zumindest eine Version mit deutschen Untertiteln geben wird. Nachtrag: Inzwischen habe ich erfahren, dass auch eine deutsche Version in Arbeit ist. Sobald diese verfügbar ist, werde ich diese hier einbinden und alle Kanäle auflisten auf denen diese Version verfügbar ist.

Nachträge der  Links/Downloadmöglichkeiten zur Doku

An dieser Stelle möchte ich  alle funktionierenden Links und Downloadmöglichkeiten zur Doku und dem dazugehörigen zugehörigen pdf-Dokument auflisten.

· Die Webseite zur Doku: theuniversalantidote.com

· Der Telegram-Kanal zur Doku: https://t.me/theuniversalantidote  mit allen Links und Downloadmöglichkeiten, sowie dem zur Doku gehörenden pdf-Dokument

· www.brighteon.com/channels/healingdisease offenbar ein anderer Videokanal des Authors der zum Thema ClO2. Hier finden sich eine Vielzahl anderer Videos zum Thema Chlordioxid.

· https://t.me/MissionGesundheit/998 Wie dort angemerkt, ist eine deutsche Übersetzung der Doku bereits in Arbeit und soll zeitnah folgen.

· https://odysee.com/@TheUniversalAntidote:5/The-Universal-Antidote:0

· rumble.com/vdey7t-the-universal-antidote.html

· www.bitchute.com/channel/vrPbyKTAWm0N/

· Der Brighteon.com-Kanal zum Film: www.brighteon.com/channels/curiousoutlier

· www.bitchute.com/channel/vrPbyKTAWm0N/

Ein Jahr Infos über das universelle Gegenmittel

Für mich ist die Veröffentlichung der Doku  The Universal Antidote am 1. Februar 2021 ein sehr passendes Datum, weil ich meinen Artikel Mehrzweckwaffe gegen Viren und Bakterien am 2. Februar 2020, also rechtzeitig vor dem Beginn der Pandemie veröffentlicht und dann im Laufe des Jahre durch eine ganze Reihe von Nachträgen und auch von Artikeln  zum Thema Chlordioxid ergänzt habe. Man kann also nicht sagen “das haben wir nicht gewußt”.

Hier dazu eine Liste meiner bisherigen Artikel zum Thema Chloridioxid chronlogisch, mit dem Datum der Veröffentlichung auf:

1. am 2. Februar 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/02/mehrzweckwaffe-gegen-viren-und-bakterien/

2. am 13. Februar 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/02/fake-news-von-correctiv/

3. am 11. März 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/03/chlordioxid-in-der-praxis/

4. am 13. April 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/04/zwei-bleichmittel-und-die-coronakrise/

5. am 26. April 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/04/kann-man-desinfektionsmittel-injizieren/

6. am 4. Mai 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/05/versuche-mit-chlordioxid/

7. am 4. Oktober 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/10/dear-mr-president/

8. am 6. Dezember 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/12/bye-bye-covid/

9. am 13. Dezember 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/12/cdl-einfach-herstellen/

10. am 19. Dezember 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/12/paradigmen-zu-covid/

11. am 31. Dezember 2020: www.freizahn.de/2020/12/info-chlordioxid-de/

12. am 1. Januar 2021:  www.freizahn.de/2021/01/bahnbrechende-corona-grundlagenforschung/

13. am 1. Januar 2021: www.freizahn.de/2021/01/wirksame-coronapraevention/

14. am 3. Januar 2021: www.freizahn.de/2021/01/corona-therapie-mit-clo2/

15. am 10. Januar 2021: www.freizahn.de/2021/01/impfen-und-corona-stop-drink/

16. am 7. Februar 2021: www.freizahn.de/2021/02/ein-bemerkenswertes-arztinterview/

Hat der Aufwand für die Recherchen und das Schreiben der Artikel etwas genutzt? Vielleicht. Es ist jetzt jedenfalls sicher nachgewiesen, dass die angeblich zum Schutz der Gesundheit der Bevölkerung angeordneten Lockdowns und sonstigen Einschränkungen mit allen dadurch entstandenen Schäden und auch die teure Entwicklung der dann auch noch sehr gefährlichen Impfstoffe nicht nötig waren.

Erschütterndes Beispiel einer Friseurin

Was diese Pandemie unter anderem auch angerichtet hat, und was man mit einer rechtzeitigen Nutzung des präventiven und therapeutischen Potentials von Chlordioxid hätte verhindern können  erklärt auch das folgenden kleine Video der Inhaberin eines Friseursalons:

Dazu kommen ungezählte Beispiele von völlig unnötig isolierten, alleine sterbenden alten Menschen, von Kindern und Jugendlichen die durch die Lockdowns geschädigt wurden. Und auch viele Beispiele von Gewalttaten und Selbstmorden als indirekte Folge der Lockdowns.

Das war alles nicht nötig. Wir könnten diesen Wahnsinn der Lockdowns kurzfristig beenden, wobei es völlig egal ist, was alles an Mutationen im Umlauf ist. Chlordioxid wirkt gegen alle Viren. Eine praktische Möglichkeit, mit der man überall im Land anfangen könnte, sind solche “Corona-Stop-Drink-Parties” wie ich sie in Impfen und Corona-Stop-Drink vorgeschlagen habe. Wir könnten die Inzidenzwerte damit in sehr kurzer Zeit auf die gewünschten Werte reduzieren.

Wir könnten mit den in Corona-Therapie mit ClO2 und in Wirksame Coronaprävention gezeigten Möglichkeiten eine Überlastung der Krankenhäuser durch Coronavirusinfektionen verhindern. Wir könnten mit Hilfe von Chlordioxid auch Impfschäden vollständig vermeiden, weil wir keine Impfungen mehr brauchen.

Die Fitness der Alten verbessern

Weil Chlordioxid das Immunsystem nicht belastet, sondern unterstützt,  ist es zudem ideal, um die Alten und Kranken vor Covid-19-Infektionen zu schützen.

Auch der inzwischen über 70 Jahre alte Dr. Allen Keyes hat in einem der in Bye-Bye Covid übersetzten Interviews erwähnt, dass er regelmäßig Chlordioxidlösung einnimmt, weil er festgestellt hat, dass diese seine durch das zunehmende Alter reduzierte Fitness wieder verbessert. Dazu liefern das folgende kleine Video und die dazu verlinkten Quellen eine Erklärung:

Kanal auf www.Brighteon.com: MMS DIY (Chlorine Dioxide) Text zum Video. Darunter die Links zu dem Artikel und zu den beiden in dem Video verwendeten, anderen Videos:

So finden Wissenschaftler heraus, dass die Sauerstoffkammer-Therapie verwendet werden kann, um viele Aspekte des Alterungsprozesses umzukehren. Sie verwenden teure Druckkammern, die sauerstoffreiche Luft zum Atmen für Patienten haben und haben festgestellt, dass dieser Prozess auch mit Heilung von verschiedenen Beschwerden hilft. JEDOCH kann man eine sehr ähnliche Reaktion im Körper erhalten, wenn man Chlordioxid einnimmt. Es ist buchstäblich Sauerstoff in flüssiger Form, den Ihr Körper bei richtiger Dosierung schnell und sicher absorbieren kann. Kommen Sie und erfahren Sie mehr über die Wissenschaft, wie das funktioniert.

https://www.israel21c.org/from-aging-to-chronic-wounds-can-hyperbaric-oxygen-cure-everything/

https://www.brighteon.com/feb26545-2ae7-4344-bd4b-7c78253395c3

https://www.brighteon.com/931f1c1e-239b-48dc-be19-8f99774ec8be

Das Problem der antibiotikaresistenten Keime

Auch haben wir mit Chlordioxid ein wirksames Mittel gegen multiresistente Keime, die gerade auch durch die Coronapandemie zu einem noch größeren Problem geworden sind. Wie groß dieses Problem inzwischen ist zeigen die folgenden Artikel:

· de.rt.com am 17.1.2021: Zurück ins “medizinische Mittelalter”? Die unterschätzte Gefahr multiresistenter Keime

· dr.rt.com am 25.12.2020: Missbräuchlicher Einsatz von Antibiotika gegen COVID-19: Gonorrhö entwickelt resistenten Superstamm

Ein Beispiel für den Weg in die Zukunft

Die Artikel Schrumpfung der Wirtschaft und Stadtentwicklung von James Howard Kunstler und 2021: Absehbar mehr Probleme von Gail Tverberg habe ich übersetzt, weil diese noch einmal zeigen, dass es mit unserer Wirtschaft nun weiter bergab gehen wird und dass die Welt wieder lokaler wird.

Die Nutzung des Potentials von Chlordioxid in der Medizin sehe ich dabei als eine der Möglichkeiten, mit deren Hilfe man die Lebensqualität und die Gesundheit der Bevölkerung trotz des Schrumpfens der für das Gesundheitswesen und den Pflegebereich verfügbaren Mittel verbessern kann.

Mit weniger Energie, weniger komplexer Technologie und weniger Kapitalaufwand mehr Lebensqualität, mehr Gesundheit und auch mehr Freiheit und Sicherheit zu erreichen, ist einer der Schlüssel für einen erfolgreichen Weg in die Zukunft.

In der Landwirtschaft und beim Klimaschutz sehe ich ähnliche Möglichkeiten, wie ich in Klimaschutz durch Landwirtschaft und anderen Artikel gezeigt habe.

In jedem Fall aber wäre es am besten, wenn sich die Bevölkerung lokal, vor Ort, selbst organisieren und helfen würde, anstatt sich weiter auf die Regierung und die diese beratenden “Experten” zu verlassen.  Solche “Corona-Stop-Drink-Parties” auf denen die Leute lernen und auch Erfahrungen dazu austauschen, wie sie Coronavirus-Infektionen, Grippe und andere Krankheiten sicher verhindern und in leichteren Fällen auch selber behandeln können, könnten ein Anfang sein. Nachträge Ist Chlordioxid wirklich ein Bleichmittel?

Videos mit deutschen Untertiteln

· Interview von “Bob the Plumber” mit Marien Barrientos von COMUSAV Mexiko,  am 2. Jan. 2021 : 2,4 Millionen Dollar für Toxizität von Chlordioxid ausgelobt ( https://odysee.com/@MissionGesundheit:b/2,4-millionen-dollar-fuer-toxizität-von-chlordioxid:a ).

· Bye bye Corona – Chlordioxid hilft nicht nur bei “Covid-19”. Das in Bye-Bye Covid übersetzte Interview mit Dr. Manuel Aparicio als Video mit deutschen Untertiteln. ( https://odysee.com/@MissionGesundheit:b/bye-bye-covid-19:c )

Videos in deutscher Sprache

· Vortrag von Dr. Theresa Forcades: Chlordioxid – Gift oder Medizin? ( https://odysee.com/@MissionGesundheit:b/chlrodioxid-gift-oder-medizin:8 )

· Vortrag von Andreas Kalcker: Eigentherapie mit Chlordioxid ( https://odysee.com/@MissionGesundheit:b/Eigentherapie-MMS-Chlordioxid-Andreas-Kalcker:8 )

· Es gehört eigentlich nicht zum Thema Chlordioxid, aber doch zum Thema “Gegenmittel”: Update von Professor Bhakdi!!! / 01.02.2021 (tube.querdenken-711.de/videos/watch/22b6af4d-e16a-46b0-9911-5a1c041b7fbe ). Dauer 5:40. Inhalt: Der PCR-Test ist laut WHO jetzt komplett sinnlos. Um als Coronafall zu zählen muß eine Person daher auch Symptome eine Coronavirusinfektion haben.  Gesunde Personen können die Infektion NICHT verbeiten. Die Pandemie ist damit eigentlich beendet. Die Impfungen gegen Corona sind sehr gefährlich.

Kelberg, den 30. Januar 2021 Christoph Becker

VORHERIGER BEITRAG2021: Absehbar mehr ProblemeNÄCHSTER BEITRAGEin bemerkenswertes Arztinterview

Hier das Ganze nochmal als .pdf, und als Redox-Reaktion wunderschön erklärt von Dr.Mai-Ling Grundwirmer.

Ich danke ihnen Hr.Becker für ihre unermüdliche Arbeit zu CDL denn es könnte eventuell die einzig WIRKLICH wirksame Waffe gegen das Laborvirus sein!
All die weltweit getroffenen Maßnahmen unterliegen augenscheinlich der Annahme, daß es sich hier um einen zoonotischen auf natürlichem Wege entstandenen Virus handelt.
Doch wie würden die getroffenen Maßnahmen beurteilt werden hinsichtlich eines völlig anderen Tatbestandes:
(Dr Paul Cottrell hatte bereits Mitte März 2020 über Furin ausführlich darüber berichtet: „Coronavirus and ACE2, Furin, GRP78 and CD-147“)

Mittels einer Methode aus der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie wurde nun in einem 193-Seiten starken Bericht die Laborherkunft zu 99,8% nachgewiesen: 

„Eine Bayes’sche Analyse kommt zu dem Schluss, dass es sich bei SARS-CoV-2 nicht um eine natürliche Zoonose handelt, sondern um einen Laborerreger.“

Übersetzte Auszüge der Arbeit von Dr. Steven Quay

„Die Ausgangswahrscheinlichkeit für den Ursprung von SARS-CoV-2 wurde mit der zoonotischen oder natürlichen Hypothese auf eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 98,8 % gesetzt, während die Hypothese des Laborursprungs auf 1,2 % gesetzt wurde. (…) Jeder neue Beweis für oder gegen jede Hypothese wurde dann verwendet, um die Wahrscheinlichkeiten anzupassen. Wenn die Beweise für einen natürlichen Ursprung sprechen, wird die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines natürlichen Ursprungs nach oben korrigiert, und so weiter. (…) Das Ergebnis dieses Berichts ist die Schlussfolgerung, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Laborursprungs für CoV-2 99,8% beträgt, mit einer entsprechenden Wahrscheinlichkeit eines zoonotischen Ursprungs von 0,2%. Dies übertrifft die meisten akademischen Diskussionen an juristischen Fakultäten über die Quantifizierung von „beyond a reasonable doubt“, der Schwelle für die Feststellung der Schuld in einem Strafverfahren. Der Bericht enthält die detaillierte Analyse und quantitative Grundlage für die Statistiken und die Schlussfolgerung.“

Besonders interessant sind die Seiten 9-11, auf denen die Hypothese zur Laborversion vorgestellt und begründet wird. Es geht vor allem um die Rolle des Furins. Dr Paul Cottrell hatte bereits Mitte März 2020 über Furin ausführlich darüber berichtet: „Coronavirus and ACE2, Furin, GRP78 and CD-147“ 

„Das Virus (SARS-CoV-2) holt sich den Proteinschlüssel Furin zur Hilfe. Furin ist ein Enzym in der Wirtszelle, das im menschlichen Körper als Proteinaktivator wirkt. Und Furin trägt erheblich zur Aktivierung des Spike Proteins (Glykoprotein) auf der Virushülle bei, was seine Affinität gegenüber dem ACE2 Rezeptor um das 10- bis 20-fache steigert. Vermutlich ist dies mit ein Grund für die rasche Ausbreitung, die Covid-19 bis zu 1000-mal infektiöser als die normale Grippe macht. Besonders viel Furin wird übrigens in Lunge, Leber und Dünndarm exprimiert, was die bekannten Covid-19 Symptome wie Pneumonie und Leberversagen erklärt. Wir haben es mit einem vom Menschen extra infektiös kreierten Virus zu tun, das sich wie eine Biowaffe durch die Welt frisst und alles zerstört……

https://zenodo.org/record/4477081#.YBY7GrgdMSV

-6- Äußerungen mit Bedenken bzgl Impfungen

Skip to content

What is this world without a further Divine purpose in it all? W. Whitman

· Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn

Comments

Category: vaccination

beyond its origins

Denmark Covid Passports Protest

https://www.rt.com/news/514837-denmark-covid-passports-protest/

By DPin News, vaccinationFebruary 8, 20216 WordsLeave a comment

Merck First US Pharma Giant to Abandon Covid Vaccine Efforts

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/merck-first-us-pharma-giant-abandon-covid-vaccine-efforts?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29

By DPin vaccinationFebruary 6, 202137 WordsLeave a comment

The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society

Source: The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 21, 202117 WordsLeave a comment

COVID Ushers in Brave New World of Vaccines

COVID Ushers in Brave New World of Vaccines

By DPin Exo/Meso/Eso, News, The planet Earth, vaccinationJanuary 12, 202121 WordsLeave a comment

Global Vaccine Passport

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/apps-now-being-developed-global-vaccine-passport?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20January%2010%20%28SH2dwA%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSIsICJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJtYWdub2xpYXBoQGdtYWlsLmNvbSJ9

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 11, 202133 WordsLeave a comment

Censored Dr. Kaufman: “They Want To Genetically Modify Us With COVID-19 Vaccine” – Loses his Job and Willing to go to Jail to Resist

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationDecember 27, 20205 WordsLeave a comment

Dr. Paul Thomas Targeted by Medical Board & Media after Landmark Vaccine study – Interview

Dr. Paul Thomas Targeted By Medical Board & Media After Landmark Vaccine Study — Interview

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationDecember 20, 20206 WordsLeave a comment

Očkování a neočkování z pohledu laika

Jeden z nejsvědomitějších praktických lékařů této planety Dr. Thomas se podílel na vědecké studii očkovaných vs neočkovaných dětí, která byla právě publikována a jeho lékařská komora ho suspendovala z výkonu lékařské praxe. Když u nás dochází k nedůvěře laické veřejnosti k povinnému očkování, stává se to právě pro tyto skutečnosti, že slyšíme o faktech, která jsou vědecky průkazná a ortodoxní medicína je zcela bez zábran označuje za  nebezpečná, aniž by byla schopná svůj postoj vědecky dokázat. Ty studie, které uvádí jako důkaz prospěšnosti vakcín, jsou publikovány ve vážených lékařských časopisech, ale nemusejí procházet žádnými nezávislými peer review.

Následující rozhovor přímo volá po mezinárodní podpoře MUDr Thomase na poli, které se stará o budoucí lidstvo této planety. Ze sedmi episod videového pořadu The Truth About Vaccines je patrné, že Dr Thomas neříká, že vakcíny nesnižují výskyt onemocnění jako například spalničky. On vysvětluje , že se dětem vracejí v dospělém věku formou pásových oparů, které jsou mnohem horším onemocněním než spalničky v dětství a že imunní systém děti, očkovaných  podle vládou sestavených očkovacích plánů není tak odolný jako u neočkovaných dětí. Časovou úpravou (hep.B po narození) snížil ve své praxi rizikovost následků prakticky k nule. Počet doporučených vakcín v USA je kolem sedmdesáti, ale ve většině států jsou dobrovolné, takže lze jejich počet regulovat podle dané situace. U nás jich je podstatně méně, ale zase jsou plošné a povinné.
https://lightonconspiracies.com/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-the-study-the-cdc-refused-to-do-interview-with-dr-weiler/
samotná studie:

https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/pdf

Feedback ortodoxu:

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/study-on-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-children-used-a-dubious-metric-for-comparing-disease-incidence-in-both-groups/
Autor chirurg cituje Kochovu studii očkovaných a neočkovaných skupin dětí jako potvrzující účinnost očkování . Před lety jsem se výzkumu chtěla účastnit, tak jsem tehdy vyplnila celý dotazník, byl však limitován věkem. Sledovala jsem ale jeho výsledky a zkopírovala si tento již těžko dostupný  graf:

Chápe ortodoxní medicína, jak je pro laiky snadné přestat věřit lékařům přinejmenším v otázce očkování, když se musejí potýkat celý život například s astma nebo herpesy a potom najdou takovouto studii? Autor recenze si ani nedá práci pozorně si přečíst tu část Kochovy studie, která je dostupná, jakou váhu má tedy recenze na studii Thomas/Weiler, když není navíc vůbec podložená desetiletími praxe s očkováním?

https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article/80869

By DPin vaccinationDecember 18, 2020523 WordsLeave a comment

Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated: The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler

Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated: The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler

By DPin vaccinationDecember 18, 20204 WordsLeave a comment

Plan Unfolding How Vaccines Will Be Monitored

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/plan-unfolding-how-vaccines-will-be-monitored?utm_campaign=DAILY%20Newsletter%3A%20Warp%20Speed%20Live%20%2B%20December%2012%20%28Rpzwb8%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJtYWdub2xpYXBoQGdtYWlsLmNvbSIsICJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSJ9

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationDecember 12, 202036 WordsLeave a comment

Doctors Around the World Issue Dire Warning: Do Not Get The Covid Vaccine

By DPin News, vaccinationDecember 9, 20204 WordsLeave a comment

By DPin Arts, vaccinationImageDecember 9, 2020Leave a comment

By DPin News, The planet Earth, vaccinationImageDecember 9, 2020Leave a comment

Covid Vaccine Approval Process

RFK, Jr. Urges FDA to Slow Down COVID Vaccine Approval Process

By DPin News, vaccinationDecember 9, 20205 WordsLeave a comment

Spagyrics – a Distinct Branch of Alchemy

Our ways of treating maladies seem really, really obsolete

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationDecember 7, 202017 WordsLeave a comment

Why Coronavirus Vaccine Requires Storage at -70C

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-11-18-why-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-requires-storage-at-70c.html

By DPin vaccinationNovember 20, 20209 WordsLeave a comment

A journey to our innermost being

via Vaccine Impact

If it ends up with us deciding who can be or not can be , the Higher Laws might manifest on Earth.

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationNovember 5, 202036 WordsLeave a comment

Where we are going:

The pictures are self evident.

https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006O6EHUA0?tab=publications

Vaccine hesitancy – one arm to mental health

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationOctober 17, 202035 WordsLeave a comment

What you were never told about vaccines

Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines

For the medical establishment of this planet

By DPin Geoengineering/military, The planet Earth, vaccinationOctober 4, 202011 WordsLeave a comment

Call for a Genocide Technologies-Pandemic Treaty Conference of the 118 Nations that ratified the International Criminal Court Statue/Treaty in Rome

https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/

https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/2020/09/sample-request-for-a-writ-of-emergency-injunction-of-mandamus.html

By DPin Biowarfare, News, The planet Earth, vaccinationOctober 4, 202016 WordsLeave a comment

University of California Retreats on Mandatory Flu Vaccine After Lawsuit Filed

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/university-of-california-retreats-on-mandatory-flu-vaccine-after-lawsuit-filed/

By DPin News, vaccinationOctober 2, 20208 WordsLeave a comment

Will New COVID Vaccine Make You Transhuman?

Would a COVID vaccine transform humans into transhumans?

Source: Will New COVID Vaccine Make You Transhuman?

By DPin vaccinationSeptember 29, 202016 WordsLeave a comment

The vaccine that will be

The universe has spiritual dimensions and Noah’s Ark should not be taken only as a myth, but as a warning that the Universe is created on the principle of “The General Cosmic Harmony-of-Reciprocal-Maintenance-of-All- Cosmic-Concentrations'” and if violated, its re-establishment must follow. We are under 48 universal laws, for us mostly clandestine as we cannot see even the parallel between the oceans full of plastic bags and synthetic biology. It is quite amazing. I wonder what the plastic holy grail will do in human bodies….

https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/corvelva-ebook/covid-19-il-vaccino-che-verra.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/11/29/cells-with-lab-made-dna-produce-a-new-kind-of-protein-a-holy-grail-for-synthetic-biology/

A possible connection?

https://carnicominstitute.org/research_papers/Carnicom_Institute_Research-2019.pdf

By DPin Biowarfare, Transhumanism, vaccinationSeptember 29, 2020111 WordsLeave a comment

First peer reviewed publication on MPRV vaccines (Priorix Tetra)

VACCINEGATECORVELVA STAFF MARCH 31, 2020

We are finally here, after almost two years the first peer review publication of our analyzes comes out and many others will follow.

Here we try to summarize in these first pages, in a very discursive and non-technical way: what has been published, what validity it has and why it is important for our investigation of vaccines. 

(The following pages to 3 are instead dedicated to a technical in-depth analysis, finally leaving the evaluation of the article itself to the experts in the sector)

What was published in “F1000 Research” ¹ is the result of the initial part of the work carried out on behalf of the Corvelva Association by one of the laboratories in charge of the analyzes. We remember – because more than two years have passed since the beginning of this work and many other results have been added to the initial ones – that the first major issue that we found ourselves having to investigate was the abnormal quantity of human DNA found inside of the vaccines analyzed. 

In both quadrivalent MPRV vaccines analyzed, quantities of 1 to 2.7 micrograms / vial were initially found (as per publication in question), and this led us to publicly and immediately denounce this result because, simply, it was not expected that a this amount of DNA was present in a vaccine.

Apart from the considerations and conclusions reached by the work, which are strictly technical and therefore understandable only to those who research in the field of metagenomics, what is observed in the graphs is that the two vaccine samples were found to contain a high percentage of readings of human DNA in addition to those expected of the genome of the varicella virus (Human alphaherpes virus 3), the only one detectable among the four, having been presented in the article a DNA-seq type analysis.

However, we would like to underline that subsequently the quantities of DNA found and confirmed with the same method that is now validated here were even higher: up to 3.7 micrograms per vial, leading to a notable difference between lot and lot.

In fact, in our report released on 22.12.2018 ² the results for further batches analyzed after those discussed in the article were reported , then further confirmed by interlaboratory analyzes which are still being published. 

Therefore, what most interests us about this publication is that it validates the method used , puts an important point on the discussions on the “type” of analyzes carried out, and consequently confirms decisively all the work carried out subsequently with the NGS method. : the in-depth analysis on the type of genetic material contained, the presence of adventitious viruses, the great absence of attenuated viruses that should instead exist and the quantity instead out of control (also because very different from sample to sample) of the human DNA present, the mutant population , phages, DNA deriving from other species, and gradually all the results that you find summarized on our site. ³

Everything that, from the point of view of biological content, we have denounced in recent years, slavishly reporting the results to the control bodies, takes on a more relevant scientific connotation (even if, we repeat again, it was not peer-reviews that had to worry but the data presented, very serious in their content and in their possible implications for human health). However, now that the publication of the method has been done, we will demand to obtain the answers that have not yet arrived.

These results unquestionably confirm the presence of fetal DNA in Priorix tetra vaccines, in variable quantities between the various batches, indicating a poor quality control of these pharmaceutical products. 

We also recall the report on the sequencing of the entire genome of MRC-5 published on the Corvelva website on 27.09.2019 ⁴ in which the profound modification of this DNA is evident also in genes associated with the development of tumor pathologies (another data in progress publication).

The contaminating fetal DNA present in all samples analyzed in variable (therefore uncontrolled) quantities is up to 300 times higher than the limit imposed by the EMA for carcinogenic DNA (10 ng / dose, corresponding to the DNA contained in about 1000 cancer cells, obtained on the basis of a statistical calculation, while the precautionary limit is 100 pg / dose) limit that must necessarily also be applied to the fetal DNA that inevitably contaminates the Priorix Tetra.

It follows that this vaccine must be considered defective and potentially dangerous for human health, in particular of the pediatric population much more vulnerable to genetic and autoimmune damage due to immaturity in shelter systems.

As anticipated, the following is a more “technical” part and difficult to understand for non-experts, therefore we have decided, also for transparency, to attach to this document also the “Dossier EMA – NGS Discussion of the results obtained from the survey on the quality of vaccines “ . We had to extrapolate only the disclosable part, over 50 pages of the dossier compared to the 200 of the NGS, since much of the information contained and registered with the regulatory bodies must remain confidential. The harsh law of science provides that a data can be published in a journal only if unpublished and we, having several other publications in the works, do not want to put them at risk.

 Finally, for the avoidance of doubt, we would like to mention, from the publication, the part of the “Funding Statement”: 

“B1 and B2 metagenomic sequencing was funded by Corvelva (non-profit association, Veneto, Italy), under a service contract with the laboratory. No other contributions were involved in supporting the work. Funders played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. “

Attachments:

· Publication – Do you cov me? Effect of coverage reduction on metagenome shotgun sequencing studies

· CORVELVA-discussion-NGS-EMA-eng

· PDF – First peer review publication on MPRV vaccines (Priorix Tetra)

---

In the article “Do you cov me? Effect of coverage reduction on metagenome shotgun sequencing studies “

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059852/

The authors address the technical-methodological question of whether it is possible to use a parallel massive metagenomics approach with low reading coverage to characterize complex biological matrices. Estimates of diversity and abundance of species are calculated and the ability to reconstruct the metagenome de novo in terms of length and completeness is evaluated, in order to understand how much the decrease in sequencing depth, varied by randomly sub-sampling the sequencing readings, can The results show that the diversity indices of prokaryotic, eukaryotic and viral complex communities can be accurately estimated with 500,000 reads or less, although particularly complex samples may require 1,000,000 reads. In reverse,

Among the various, and very different, complex matrices subjected to massive metagenomic analysis, two biological medicines were included, i.e. two different batches of live attenuated MPRV vaccine used for immunization against measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox in children. DNA was extracted from the vaccines, genomic libraries were then built using standard commercial protocols and massive sequencing was carried out with Illumina technology.

Apart from the considerations and conclusions reached by the work, which are strictly technical and therefore understandable only to those who research in the field of metagenomics, what is observed in the pie charts contained in the ‘Extended data’ (https://osf.io/wq395/ samples B1 and B2) is that the two vaccine samples were found to contain a high percentage of human DNA readings in addition to those expected from the genome of the varicella virus (Human alphaherpes virus 3), the only detectable among the four, since a DNA-seq type analysis was presented in the article. 

71% of the readings in one lot and 88% in the other are of human origin, presumably from the MRC-5 fetal cell line ( remember that subsequent analyzes confirmed that the line is MRC5 ) in which live attenuated rubella and chickenpox viruses are grown during vaccine preparation. Furthermore, as happened in the different batches of the same MPRV vaccine tested by Corvelva between 2017 and 2019, the amount of DNA extracted is of the order of a microgram. 

In vaccine batches tested with the same protocols and technology reported in the materials and methods of the article, the quantities detected ranged between 1 and almost 3 micrograms per vial, quantities varying from one batch to another, but always significant.

B1 https://osf.io/86mbn/

B2 https://osf.io/dxayz/

In the report disclosed by Corvelva on 22.12.2018, the following results were reported for further batches analyzed after those discussed in the article , then further confirmed by interlaboratory analysis still being published: 

Priorix Tetra lot. A71CB205A (June 2018) – DNA analysis

Priorix Tetra lot. A71CB256A (December 2018) – DNA analysis

DNA analysis

The measurement of the DNA concentration with QuBit fluorometer showed that lot A71CB205A, contains a quantity of gDNA of 1.7 µg total per 0.5mL dose, calculated as follows: 9.41ng / µl (concentration determined at QuBit) x 45 (volume of resuspension DNA final after extraction, expressed in microliters) x 4 (the starting volume subjected to the extraction procedure is ¼ of the volume of the dose contained in the entire vial equal to 0.5mL).

The measurement of the DNA concentration with QuBit fluorometer showed that lot A71CB256A, contains a quantity of gDNA of 3.7 µg total per 0.5mL dose , calculated as follows: 40.8 ng / µl (concentration determined at QuBit) x 55 (volume of resuspension final DNA after extraction expressed in microliters) x 5/3 (the starting volume subjected to the extraction procedure was 300 µl on 500 µl of suspension).

The human DNA found in this lot is approximately 8 to 1 relative to chickenpox DNA (see results below of the DNA fragment classification-seq, which shows that 88% of the total sequenced DNA fragments are human origin, and 11% are from the varicella virus genome). Considering that NGS is a quantitative technology, the fluorimetric quantification of the total DNA extracted from the vaccine (e.g. lot. A71CB256A = 3.7 micrograms per dose), associated with the relative quantification consideration made above (8: 1), allows us to say that human DNA could be about 2.9 micrograms per dose , compared to about 740 nanograms of chickenpox DNA. It is also plausible thatat least a portion of the high molecular weight DNA that is seen on the gel may be high molecular weight human DNA.

RNA analysis

The quantity of RNA contained in the vial of vaccine lot A71CB256A was found to be about 200ng .

The RIN equal to 8 indicates an excellent quality RNA and an intact eukaryotic RNA, being present both the 18S and 28S peaks typical of eukaryotic RNA.

The answers to our questions forwarded to the regulatory agencies over time are of great importance. Currently, the agencies have not yet answered the questions regarding the results of the full analyzes delivered to the EMA and AIFA.

Extract from the EMA’s answer to our question about the safety of mrc-5 residues in the priorix tetra vaccine (EMA request reference ask-43967 3 august 2018) – “Based on published information, Priorix Tetra contains viral strains produced separately in chicken embryo cells (mumps and measles) or human MRC-5 diploid cells (rubella and chicken pox). The cell lines used for Priorix Tetra include human diploid cell lines that cannot divide continuously. Note that, according to the European Pharmacopoeia, MRC-5 diploid cell lines are not tumorigenic, as demonstrated by decades of use and control, and therefore an upper limit for MRC-5 cell DNA does not apply “

To date we have not been provided with evidence (neither in terms of product quality analysis certificates, nor scientific reference literature for the EMA) of these controls ensuring that it is appropriate not to apply an upper limit.

In the FDA guideline “Guidance for Industry: Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications” ^{6 it} is reported that:

· a diploid cell strain should always remain diploid. If these characteristics are not stable, it must be demonstrated that the instability does not adversely affect the production or conformity of the product.

· for widely used human diploid cell strains, such as MRC-5 and WI-38 cells, measurement of residual DNA may not be necessary because we do not consider residual DNA from these human diploid cells to be a safety concern  

· residual DNA for non-tumorigenic continuous cells, such as low pass VERO cells, should be limited to less than 10 ng / dose for parenteral inoculation as recommended by WHO

And in the WHO guideline “Annex 3 – Recommendations for the evaluation of animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological medicines and for the characterization of cell banks. Replacement of Annex 1 of the WHO technical report series, No. 878 ” ⁷ is added: (…) considerable experience has been accumulated on the cytogenetics of WI-38 and MRC-5 since the 1960s

and in support of this experience, the following articles are listed:

· Jacobs JP. Updated results on the karyology of the WI-38, MRC-5 and MRC-9 cell strains. Developments in Biological Standardization, 1976, 37: 155–156.

· Jacobs JP. et al. Guidelines for the acceptability, management and testing of serially propagated human diploid cells for the production of live virus vaccines for use in man. Journal of Biological Standardization, 1981, 9: 331–342.

· Petricciani JC et al. Karyology standards for rhesus diploid cell line DBS-FRhL-2. Journal of Biological Standardization, 1976, 4: 43–49.

· Schollmayer and et al. High resolution analysis and differential condensation in RBA-banded human chromosomes. Human Genetics, 1981, 59: 187–193.

· Rønne M. Chromosome preparation and high resolution banding techniques: a review. Journal of Dairy Science, 1989, 72: 1363–1377.

It can be clearly observed that the reference literature, to argue that the diploid cells used for the production of vaccines are safe from the point of view of genetic stability, is obsolete . The first genetic anomalies were already found 40 years ago, considered negligible for the safety of vaccines, and from what is reported in the WHO guideline, since then no updates have been made with new sequencing technologies, in particular in NGS, which is also economical. and rapid, with the consequence that in the vaccines administeredfor decades the presence of DNA progressively more and more genetically modified and in uncontrolled quantities has been allowed by agencies. In this regard, see the report on the sequencing of the entire genome of MRC-5 published on the Corvelva website on 27.09.2019 ⁸ in which the profound modification of this DNA is evident also in genes associated with the development of tumor pathologies. (data being published)

Below is an extract from the letter from Dr. T. Deisher, a world expert in the therapeutic use of stem cells and gene therapy, which underlines the concern of the risks associated with the use of vaccines contaminated with residues. of human fetal cells: 

Dr. T. DEISHER (letter to the rulers – April 8, 2019) ⁹ – (…) injecting our children with human fetal DNA contamination carries the risk of causing two well-established pathologies:

· insertional mutagenesis: human fetal DNA embeds itself into the baby’s DNA causing mutations. Gene therapy using homologous recombination of small fragments has shown that amounts as small as 1.9 ng / mL of DNA fragments result in genome insertion of stem cells in 100% of injected mice. Levels of human fetal DNA fragments in our children after vaccination with MMR, VARIVAX (varicella) or hepatitis A vaccines reach levels above 1.9 ng / mL.

· autoimmune disease: fetal human DNA stimulates the immune system’s reaction to attack the body of the boy / girl.

Our results greatly reinforce the experimental observations of Dr. Deisher and above all the fact that the contaminating fetal DNA present in all the samples analyzed in variable (therefore uncontrolled) quantities is up to 300 times higher than the limit imposed by the EMA for Carcinogenic DNA (10 ng / dose, corresponding to the DNA contained in about 1000 cancer cells, obtained on the basis of a statistical calculation, while the precautionary limit is 100 pg / dose) limit that must necessarily also be applied to fetal DNA which inevitably contaminates the Priorix Tetra.

It follows that this vaccine must be considered defective and potentially dangerous for human health, in particular of the pediatric population much more vulnerable to genetic and autoimmune damage due to immaturity in shelter systems.

---

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059852/

2. https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate/analysis-metagenomiche-su-priorix-tetra.html

3. https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate.html
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en.html

4. https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate/sequenziamento-del-genoma-completo-di-mrc-5-contenuto-in-priorix-tetra.html

5. https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate/analysis-metagenomiche-su-priorix-tetra.html

6. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/03/04/2010-4553/guidance-for-industry-characterization-and-qualification-of-cell-substrates-and-other-biological

7. https://www.who.int/biologicals/vaccines/TRS_978_Annex_3.pdf

8. https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate/sequenziamento-del-genoma-completo-di-mrc-5-contenuto-in-priorix-tetra.html

9. https://www.corvelva.it/approfondimenti/notizie/mondo/lettera-aperta-ai-legislatori-sul-dna-fetale-nei-vaccini-theresa-deisher.html

By DPin vaccinationSeptember 21, 20202,805 WordsLeave a comment

Dotting

COVID-19 and big pharma: what are 15 leading companies doing to develop a coronavirus vaccine?

https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-report/top-5-vaccine-companies-by-2017-revenue
https://www.google.com/search?q=income+of+pharmaceutical+firms&rlz=1C1CHBD_enCZ859CZ859&oq=income+of+pharmaceutical+firms&aqs=chrome..69i57.14996j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.622

https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines

https://www.biometricupdate.com/202007/examining-the-legal-landscape-for-companies-using-biometrics-in-the-united-states

By DPin News, vaccinationSeptember 18, 202067 WordsLeave a comment

The COVID-19 Vaccine. The Imposition of Compulsory Vaccination with a Biometric Health Passport?

Source: The COVID-19 Vaccine. The Imposition of Compulsory Vaccination with a Biometric Health Passport?

By DPin News, vaccinationSeptember 18, 202014 WordsLeave a comment

Humanity in insanity, worldwide

Obbligo vaccino antinfluenzale, 22 settembre voto mozione in Parlamento

By DPin News, The planet Earth, vaccinationSeptember 18, 20206 WordsLeave a comment

The U.S. sanctions imposed on the Russian research institutions for Sputnik V

A Russian government spokesperson called the decision “the sanctions theater of the absurd,” Ben Norton

reports.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (Flickr/Ken Lund)

By Ben Norton

Grayzone

Russia won the race to develop the first vaccine against the novel coronavirus. The United States has responded by slapping sanctions on a Russian research facility involved in creating it.

The U.S. government has blacklisted several Russian scientific institutes, including the Russian Defense Ministry’s 48th Central Research Institute, which has worked with other non-military medical centers to develop and test the world’s first Covid-19 vaccine.

In the midst of the global coronavirus pandemic and a historic economic crisis, Washington has escalated its global campaign of economic warfare, imposing sanctions on foreign adversaries and announcing new punitive measures on a nearly daily basis.

More than one-fourth of people on Earth live in countries that are suffering from U.S. sanctions.

In April, a Russian company sent ventilators to the United States as a form of humanitarian aid, to help overwhelmed hospitals treat coronavirus patients. It was later revealed that this Russian firm had been under U.S. sanctions since 2014.

State-Led Research Beats US Model 

The Russian government announced this August that it had registered the world’s first Covid-19 vaccine, called Sputnik V.

Sputnik V was developed by the Russian Health Ministry’s Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology. This scientific facility created the vaccine in a joint research project with the Russian Defense Ministry’s 48th Central Research Institute.

On Aug. 27, the U.S. Commerce Department imposed sanctions on Russia’s 48th Central Research Institute, blacklisting the scientific body.

While Russia took a state-led approach to create a coronavirus vaccine, the Trump administration announced a “public-private partnership” in May. The program, called “Operation Warp Speed,” saw the U.S. government dole out billions of tax dollars to Big Pharma companies.

The Trump administration awarded massive contracts to private corporations like Novavax, Pfizer, and Moderna, while Trump reportedly offered “large sums of money” for exclusive rights to a vaccine being developed by a German firm so it could be sold for profit.

But the U.S. public-private partnership was unable to develop a vaccine before foreign countries with government-led research efforts did. Besides Russia, a state-owned Chinese company says its vaccine will be ready by the end of 2020, while Cuba is doing clinical trials for a vaccine of its own.

US Blacklists Russian Research Centers 

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security announced a series of new sanctions measures on Russian research centers in the U.S.government’s federal register on Aug. 27.

Washington accused the blacklisted institutes of being associated with Russian chemical and biological weapons programs. The Kremlin denied this, calling the accusation “absolute nonsense.”

Russian research institutions sanctioned by the U.S. government on Aug. 27, 2020.

A spokesperson for the Russian government called the decision “the sanctions theater of the absurd.” A Kremlin press release blasted Washington for being unable to “live without sanctions and without declaring restrictions for anyone every day.”

“Given the scientific research of one of the institutes [which is engaged in developing Russia’s coronavirus vaccine] we cannot rule out that this is another example of uncovered and rampant non-competitive struggle,” said the Russian government spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov.

The U.S. government’s media arm, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), accused these Russian research facilities of developing chemical and biological weapons.

At the same time, RFE/RL acknowledged, “Those targeted by the U.S. Commerce Department include one Russian Defense Ministry facility that is involved in Russia’s attempts to develop the world’s first COVID-19 vaccine.”

RFE/RL explained, “Formally, the move imposes new licensing restrictions on U.S. companies that seek to do business with the blacklisted companies in Russia or

elsewhere.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1298984519035318274&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fconsortiumnews.com%2F2020%2F08%2F28%2Fus-sanctions-russian-research-institute-that-developed-covid-19-vaccine%2F&theme=light&widgetsVersion=223fc1c4%3A1596143124634&width=550px

Russian state media noted that, in addition to being used to conduct clinical trials for the Covid-19 vaccine, the Defense Ministry’s newly blacklisted 48th Central Research Institute is “where vaccines against Ebola and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), as well as a universal flu vaccine, had been studied and successfully tested.”

The U.S. sanctions were imposed on the following Russian research institutions:

33rd Scientific Research and Testing Institute

48th Central Scientific Research Institute, Kirov

48th Central Scientific Research Institute, Sergiev Posad

48th Central Scientific Research Institute, Yekaterinburg

State Scientific Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology

As the U.S. Commerce Department blacklisted these Russian research facilities, it imposed additional sanctions on two dozen Chinese institutions — mostly construction, technology, and communications companies — accusing them of “engaging in activities contrary to U.S. national security interests.”

Ben Norton is a journalist and writer. He is a reporter for The Grayzone, and the producer of the “Moderate Rebelspodcast,” which he co-hosts with Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.com, and he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.

By DPin vaccinationAugust 30, 2020893 WordsLeave a comment

Application of Sound Frequencies as anEpigenetic Tool in Reversing the LimitingSymptoms of Autism

via https://authenticautismsolutions.com/autism-symptoms-reversed-applying-sound-frequencies/
https://authenticautismsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Sound-Epigenetics-Reversing-symptoms-in-Autism-1.pdf

By DPin vaccinationAugust 30, 202012 WordsLeave a comment

The 3rd amendment, issued on August 24th, 2020, allows pharmacists to administer vaccines to children ages 3-18.

by Wayne Rohde
Health Impact News

While our nation was busy spending a considerable amount of time discussing racial inequalities (as we should) or whether or not public schools and colleges were going to open or start online, or debating the upcoming national political conventions, our federal government, specifically, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued his 3^rd amendment to The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP).

The Act was first enacted this year by a declaration from the Secretary of HHS on March 10, 2020. 

The 3rd amendment, issued on August 24^th, 2020, allows pharmacists to administer vaccines to children ages 3-18. Many states had previously established restrictions on who could administer childhood vaccinations. 

I must admit that this announcement slipped past me last week. I was alerted to it when talking with a parent advocate one evening. I could not believe it and thought it must be just for a specific state.

Later, I searched the internet to find a few articles dated August 19^th, 20^th and 21^st. The Federal Register listed the action on Monday, August 24, 2020. [1]

I remember my dad who was a pharmacist in North Dakota. In the 60’s and 70’s, he mastered the art of compounding pharmacy.

He was very busy preparing prescriptions for his customers, trying to interpret correctly the doctor’s handwriting.

He was very proud of his profession. Yet I doubt that he would enjoy today’s modern pharmacy. I would think that he would say vaccinations are for doctors, not for pharmacists.

This action by the Secretary of HHS allows certain licensed pharmacists to order and administer, and pharmacy interns (who are acting under the supervision of a licensed pharmacist) to administer, any vaccine that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends to persons ages 3 through 18.

This amendment was prompted by a report from the CDC in which it found a significant decrease in rates of routine childhood vaccinations. [2]

Now with the federal announcement of this declaration, how will this play out in the states? How much weight does this declaration have regarding state law which traditionally regulates the activities of state licensed pharmacists?

So the question now to be answered, does this declaration by the Secretary of HHS supersede state law? 

In the last couple of years, there were many proposed legislative bills introduced to allow pharmacists to administer childhood vaccines that did not go anywhere in state legislatures around the country.

Is this declaration a product of those legislative failures?

Or is this a flare shot high in the air to signal to state health departments to use their rule-making authority to modify statutes to allow pharmacies to enter the childhood vaccination arena?

Even my home state of Minnesota passed legislation in May, 2020 to allow pharmacists to administer any FDA-approved COVID vaccine to children as young as 6 years of age.

This is not a mandate, but rather setting up a horrible scenario for which pharmacists are clearly not trained to handle. The method of passing legislation during a Peacetime Emergency declaration by governors to circumvent public testimony is very troubling.

The PREP Act has been previously amended twice prior to this declaration.

Previous amendments of The PREP Act include:

The 1st amendment on April 10^th to extend liability immunity to covered countermeasures authorized under the newly passed CARES Act. [3] This declaration provides limited immunity to manufacturers of masks, plastic shields, gloves and other protective equipment.

The 2nd amendment on June 4^th for the purpose of clarifying that covered countermeasures include qualified countermeasures that limit the harm COVID-19 might otherwise cause. [4] Basically, allowing the use of therapeutics and other measures that were not designed for COVID, to be used if necessary.

Now comes the problem of allowing pharmacists to administer childhood vaccines.

In the Vaccine Court currently, the number one petition filed for compensation is for shoulder injury as the result of a vaccination (SIRVA). Most of the injured persons (adults) received influenza or Tdap vaccinations from their local retail pharmacy such as Walgreens, CVS, RiteAid or Target. 

If these retail pharmacies cannot properly administer a vaccine to an adult, why would we allow this for children?

One of the biggest problems when filing a petition claiming shoulder injury is the failure of the retail pharmacies to accurately record in the medical records which arm the vaccine was administered in and who did it. These pharmacies can barely keep up with adults receiving one vaccine at a time.

What happens when a parent brings their child into the business to get several vaccines? Will the pharmacy tech or pharmacist record the date, time, which arm or leg?

Probably not.

Will they be able to obtain and examine a thorough review of medical records prior to administering the vaccine?

Probably not.

Most doctors lack any comprehensive training of what a vaccine injury is or adverse reactions in a child, let alone a pharmacist receiving this type of training.

This has all the makings for a disaster.

But why is our government transferring the responsibility of administering vaccines to retail pharmacies instead of doctors’ offices or clinics? 

It just might be the pushback from doctors who claim it is not profitable or too costly to administer basic vaccinations in their office. From their point of view, it would be more cost effective in a pharmacy setting.

Or is it something more sinister? It does appear that our government, with pressure from Pharma, is trying to “gut” the NVICP and slowly move injury compensation into the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

This is clearly the landing spot for the COVID vaccine. And it is the black hole for those who are injured or have perished because of a vaccine.

If the public is withheld case decisions and information about CICP, then vaccine injury claims will no longer exist.

So many agendas by our government agencies and medical community have no regard for the best interest of the people. 

The BIG problem here is The PREP Act being used as a vehicle to circumvent Congress. The real concern is will we see a federal mandate for COVID vaccine at some point in the future via The PREP Act?

They are adopting policy via fiat without proper and necessary public comments and testimony. Will the PREP Act become the vehicle to advance vaccine policy in the United States?

I believe that we will see a few more amendments to The PREP Act if Congress will not address the liability issue for businesses, schools, colleges to open up. There are lawsuits already filed by employees for wrongful death (WalMart) and hospitalizations of employees claiming being infected by COVID while employed.

We must remain vigilant, we must be prepared to act, and we must educate our elected officials on a federal level, state and local level as well.

The PREP Act is in force as declared in March, 2020 until October, 2024 unless revoked by the Secretary of HHS or POTUS, or another health care emergency emerges.

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

Wayne Rohde is the author of The Vaccine Court. He has an upcoming Podcast of NVICP, The PREP Act, CounterMeasures Injury Comp Program and COVID vaccine legal issues starting Mid-October.

References

[1] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-24/pdf/2020-18542.pdf

[2] https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/third-amendment-to-prep-act-declaration-further-expands-scope-of-liability-immunity-for-medical-countermeasures-against-covid-19.html?utm_source=Mondaq&utm_medium=syndication&utm_campaign=LinkedIn-integration

[3] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-04-15/pdf/2020-08040.pdf

[4] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-06-08/pdf/2020-12465.pdf

By DPin vaccinationAugust 30, 20201,273 WordsLeave a comment

Politics and Corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO)

Source: Politics and Corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO)

By DPin Biowarfare, vaccinationAugust 4, 202010 WordsLeave a comment

Covid19 vaccines

Serious talk is definitely needed on a planetary scale, we do not want to burden karma of the next generations, do we?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/22/us-government-taps-pfizer-to-produce-millions-of-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine.html

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-08-01/U-S-makes-deal-for-100-million-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine-SAPWLgBJKM/index.html

https://www.rt.com/russia/496833-russia-vaccine-program-ready-october/

By DPin News, vaccinationAugust 3, 202045 WordsLeave a comment

Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data

Microsoft patent 060606 – Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data

By DPin Biowarfare, Exo/Meso/Eso, Geoengineering/military, Health, News, PSYOPS/mind control, The planet Earth, Transhumanism, vaccinationJuly 27, 20208 WordsLeave a comment

REGULATION (EU) 2020/… OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of … on the conduct of clinical trials with and supply of medicinal products for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms intended to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-28-2020-INIT/en/pdf

By DPin News, vaccinationJuly 26, 202012 WordsLeave a comment

Vaccine against COVID-19: Council adopts measures to facilitate swift development

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/07/14/vaccine-against-covid-19-council-adopts-measures-to-facilitate-swift-development/

via https://lightonconspiracies.com/european-commission-adopts-gmo-vaccine-to-combat-non-existent-covid-19-virus/

By DPin vaccinationJuly 26, 202016 WordsLeave a comment

???

https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/world-leaders-make-historic-commitments-provide-equal-access-vaccines-all

By DPin vaccinationJuly 17, 20207 WordsLeave a comment

Novavax

Novavax buys Praha Vaccines for Covid-19 vaccine manufacturing

One of the things I do not understand at all.

By DPin vaccinationJuly 17, 202017 WordsLeave a comment

Dr. A. Kaufman Responds to Reuters Fact Check on Covid 19 Vaccine Genetically Modifying Humans

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Responds To Reuters Fact Check on COVID-19 Vaccine Genetically Modifying Humans

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-19-vaccine-modify/false-claim-a-covid-19-vaccine-will-genetically-modify-humans-idUSKBN22U2BZ

Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine

By DPin News, Transhumanism, vaccinationJuly 4, 202029 WordsLeave a comment

The Template for Mandatory Vaccines – democracy sacrificed for medical tyranny

as elsewhere.

By DPin vaccinationJune 17, 20206 WordsLeave a comment

In 1917 Rudolf Steiner foresaw a vaccine that would ‘drive all inclination toward spirituality out of people’s souls’

Source: In 1917 Rudolf Steiner foresaw a vaccine that would ‘drive all inclination toward spirituality out of people’s souls’

The similar, more general conclusion is to be found in BT of G.I.G:

“But from all the experiments conducted by this sage, it became evident that the most harmful vibrations for contemporary terrestrial three-brained beings are the ones produced in them by what they call ‘medical remedies.’

By DPin vaccinationJune 9, 202069 WordsLeave a comment

Vaccine Trial

Vaccine Trial Catastrophe: Moderna Vaccine has 20% ‘Serious’ Injury Rate in High Dose Group • Children’s Health Defense https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-trial-catastrophe-moderna-vaccine-has-20-serious-injury-rate-in-high-dose-group/
https://www.fda.gov/media/73679/download

By DPin vaccinationMay 26, 202028 WordsLeave a comment

The biggest next battle on covid 19 that you don’t know your position on yet

The BIGGEST Next Battle on COVID-19 That You Don’t Know Your Position On Yet

By DPin Comments, vaccinationMay 13, 20205 WordsLeave a comment

Aluminium in human brain tissue from donors without neurodegenerative disease: A comparison with Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and autism

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64734-6

Aluminium in human brain tissue

By DPin vaccinationMay 12, 202015 WordsLeave a comment

2. What is in the vaccines, are they effective?

https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/episode-2/?utm_campaign=ttav&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ttav-2020-optins&utm_content=ep2-ttav-2020-apr23-1130pm&a_aid=5903de82cac79#

By DPin vaccinationApril 24, 202031 WordsLeave a comment

The Truth About Vaccines I

https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/episode-1/?utm_campaign=ttav&utm_medium=email&utm_source=all-actives-ttav&utm_content=ep1-ttav-2020-apr23-9am&a_aid=5903de82cac79#

By DPin vaccinationApril 24, 202030 WordsLeave a comment

The Truth About Vaccines 2020 Documentary Series

The Truth About Vaccines 2020

By DPin News, vaccinationApril 15, 202031 WordsLeave a comment

If we have scientists on one side saying there is climate change and on the other, scientists saying there is no climate change and we do not threaten them, why do we do it to anti-vaccine scientists? Is there some hidden agenda like ID2020?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/02/01/posting-anti-vaccine-propaganda-social-media-could-become-criminal/?fbclid=IwAR1UThsFhT5USBeLnuUS-lK4ZBwSGB-YV55d5flhUbZIp-zWT854YMnfrzk

By DPin vaccinationApril 1, 202015 WordsLeave a comment

COVID19 Mandatory Mass Vaccinations?

By DPin vaccinationMarch 31, 20205 WordsLeave a comment

Id2020 and Partners Launch Program to Provide Digital Id With Vaccines

View at Medium.com

View at Medium.com

View at Medium.com

https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines

View at Medium.com

View at Medium.com

By DPin vaccinationMarch 18, 202052 WordsLeave a comment

No one worries?

While reading the reports about the vaccine industry I get curious about what priorities the Police have when choosing the subject to spend time on…I mean if vaccines are responsible for 75% of sudden infant deaths and they are compulsory, should not they deserve some serious thinking as well?

By DPin vaccinationMarch 7, 202049 WordsLeave a comment

A six in one vaccine associated with sudden infant death

A Six-in-One Vaccine Associated with Sudden Infant Death…

By DPin vaccinationMarch 7, 20207 WordsLeave a comment

Who Experimenting on African Children Without Informed Consent

WHO Experimenting on African Children Without Informed Consent

By DPin vaccinationMarch 7, 20208 WordsLeave a comment

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated

Herpes – unvaccinated – 0.27%

– vaccinated        12.80%

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 30, 20206 WordsLeave a comment

UN Health Experts Admit Vaccine adjuvants have harming long term effects

Global Vaccine Safety Summit,  Geneva December 2019

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-01-13-un-health-experts-admit-toxic-vaccine-ingredients-are-harming-children-worldwide-transcript.html

By DPin News, Uncategorized, vaccinationJanuary 14, 202014 WordsLeave a comment

What you get when you become one of the beings most passionately fighting for the well-being of humanity

What You Get For $360 Per Day

By DPin News, The planet Earth, vaccinationJanuary 6, 20207 WordsLeave a comment

The schools as mental health institutions

https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/01/schools-now-take-the-place-of-mental-health-institutions.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ageofautism+%28AGE+OF+AUTISM%29

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 5, 202022 WordsLeave a comment

Government countermeasures injury compensation program along with other dangerous vaccines

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 5, 20204 WordsLeave a comment

A BILL to amend and reenact §54.1-2969 of the Code of Virginia, relating to vaccinations and immunizations; minors; authority to consent -VA SB 104

https://legiscan.com/VA/text/SB104/2020?fbclid=IwAR00RUi1R7SjqecC8lP8ol4amx6trqP0FNyEWx4f7uj9oiowbUyPXw60k2A

via https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/virginia-bill-to-allow-children-to-decide-on-vaccines-without-parents-knowledge-or-permission/

By DPin vaccinationJanuary 1, 202026 WordsLeave a comment

Antibodies are not required for immunity against some viruses

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120301143426.htm

By DPin vaccinationDecember 29, 20196 WordsLeave a comment

Vaccination card/Passport for EU Citizens

via https://lightonconspiracies.com/order-out-of-chaos-outbreak-to-microchip/

By DPin News, vaccinationDecember 29, 201919 WordsLeave a comment

Where is the boundary beyond which the science and the states have no power over our bodies? Death?

Just reading the following study was enough to wonder about the abilities of the genetic scientists to mentate on the issues like the origins of the species. If you know that monkeys are half humans and half animals which you cannot know not by now,  then you must assume that viruses of monkeys will be most likely transferrable to humans?https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/biologics-research-projects/investigating-viruses-cells-used-make-vaccines-and-evaluating-potential-threat-posed-transmission

Another shock to the thinking mind comes from the scientific endeavour to tattoo the medical information into the skin of a  human body by microneedles. 

It is ’a sophisticated version of the last century’s tattooing prisoners’ numbers into their skin at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Monowitz. How come that our scientists do not have in their conscience repulsion to such projects? I would like to remind the habitat of this planet that by not resisting it you are psychologically getting ready for the state of global affairs, described in Revelations. That state contradicts the Universal Plan, therefore, is not sustainable in time so why to proceed with it at all?

The Universe is spiritual, 80% of the global population understands that quite clearly so perhaps that 80 % should get finally informed and assert its rights of the overwhelming majority to stop the invasions of bodily privacies before it’s too late.

Who else can explain to you better, that we were born for specific purposes but physical & psychological slavery is not one of them yet you are voluntarily heading to where I am already by force?

By DPin vaccinationDecember 29, 2019250 WordsLeave a comment

Incomprehensible Logic

“Vaccines are exceptionally safe and effective, saving an estimated 2 million to 3 million lives annually (1)”

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162

“Deaths in the US during 2004-2015:

Due to measles – 0  (source CDC)   Due to measles vaccines – 108 (source VAERS)

(est. only 1% of cases reported)

Does not one find it confusing? These two simple official facts support a very old question: ‘what is the real purpose of vaccinations’?

 By DPin vaccinationDecember 27, 201973 WordsLeave a comment

‘Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination’

Each century has its own characteristic, has it not?

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162/tab-pdf

via https://lightonconspiracies.com/invisible-ink-could-soon-reveal-whether-children-have-been-vaccinated/

By DPin News, vaccinationDecember 27, 201921 WordsLeave a comment

There is a steeply rising problem of global, generational nature. Connecting the dots in the right way would certainly help.

https://www.lossofbraintrust.com/
https://www.theorganicprepper.com/quiet-rooms-solitary-confinement-children/
via https://lightonconspiracies.com/school-quiet-rooms-solitary-confinement-for-children/

By DPin The planet Earth, vaccinationDecember 27, 201914 WordsLeave a comment

Testimony on MA Bills H.4095 a S.2359

Testimony on MA Bills H.4095 and S.2359

By DPin vaccinationDecember 11, 20196 WordsLeave a comment

Almost Quarter Billion Dollars Paid Out For Vaccine Injuries in a year

By DPin vaccinationDecember 8, 20194 WordsLeave a comment

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Administered as a First Dose to Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Noninferiority, Lot-to-Lot Consistency Study

When compared with the MMR II vaccine (M-M-R-II) currently available in the United States, a first dose of MMR-RIT (Priorix) given to 1-year-old children elicit

Source: Immunogenicity and Safety of a Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Administered as a First Dose to Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Noninferiority, Lot-to-Lot Consistency Study
via
https://mailchi.mp/childrenshealthdefense.org/weekly-wrap-up-mmr-whistleblower-update-rfk-jr-is-moh-person-of-the-year-aluminum-warnings-ignored-falconry-with-rfk-jr-more?e=024df48761

By DPin vaccinationDecember 6, 201960 WordsLeave a comment

The 2020 National Vaccine Plan for All

https://lightonconspiracies.com/ministry-of-pharma-the-2020-national-vaccine-plan/ I thought that Mt Everest climbers would bring some light down to us, but either they did not find any or decided to keep it for themselves.

By DPin News, vaccinationNovember 30, 201932 WordsLeave a comment

DNA Biosensors, DNA Hybridisation Biosensors, SPR-DNA Biosensor

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/dna-biosensorsa-review-2155-9538-1000222.php?aid=89456

By DPin vaccinationNovember 28, 201910 WordsLeave a comment

Next generation biosensors for biophysical characterisation and detection of viruses – UCL Discovery

‘You are not your own’

Source: Next generation biosensors for biophysical characterisation and detection of viruses – UCL Discovery

By DPin vaccinationNovember 28, 201919 WordsLeave a comment

Posts navigation

Older posts

What is this world without a further Divine purpose in it all? W. Whitman

Blog at WordPress.com.